Page 2 - ஸுரி காப்பீடு ப்ல் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Blog: Court of Appeal Upholds Decision on Inducement | Cooley LLP
jdsupra.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jdsupra.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Regulator says it won t help firms fighting for Covid cover
independent.ie - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from independent.ie Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
);
Hotel brings High Court action over insurer s failure to pay out on Covid-19 business disruption claim
The claim has been brought by the awarding winning Headfort Arms Hotel in Kells, Co Meath. By Aodhan O Faolain Friday 5 Mar 2021, 2:32 PM Mar 5th 2021, 2:32 PM 14,805 Views 0 Comments
Image: Graham Hughes via RollingNews.ie
Image: Graham Hughes via RollingNews.ie
A WELL-KNOWN Co Meath hotel has launched High Court proceedings over a failure by insurer Zurich to pay out on a claim for business disruption caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.
The claim has been brought by the awarding winning Headfort Arms Hotel in Kells, Co Meath.
Updated / Friday, 5 Mar 2021
18:48
The court heard there was an urgency about this claim
A well-known Co Meath hotel has launched High Court proceedings over a failure by insurer Zurich to pay out on a claim for business disruption caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.
The claim has been brought by the awarding winning Headfort Arms Hotel, in Kells Co Meath.
Represented by Richard Kean SC, Darren Lehane SC and Gareth Robinson Bl, the 4-star 260 bedroomed hotel says it entered into a policy of insurance with Zurich in October 2019.
The hotel claims that under that policy it is entitled to be indemnified for the disruption its business has suffered, including forced closure, due to the pandemic.
15 January 2021
Insurance – Business interruption insurance – COVID-19
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) commenced the present test case under the Financial Markets Test Case Scheme (the scheme) for the benefit of insurance policyholders, who held insurance policies which covered them against losses arising from interruption of business, to urgently clarify whether or not there was cover in principle under a variety of different standard insurance policies for COVID-19 related business losses. The defendants were eight insurers who were leading providers of ‘business interruption’ insurance. The aim of the proceedings was to achieve the maximum clarity possible for the maximum number of policyholders and their insurers by considering a representative sample of standard form business interruption policies. The proper interpretation of four types of clauses in particular were considered, namely; (i) ‘disease clauses’; (ii) ‘prevention of access clauses’; (iii) ‘
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.