Page 4 - ரேண்டல் ஓத்தூலே News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
John Hood | Users should pay for highways
ansonrecord.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from ansonrecord.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Opinion: Mileage-based user fee should replace gas tax
msn.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from msn.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
NC drivers should pay for state s roads through a user fee
fayobserver.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from fayobserver.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
As a fiscal conservative who thinks government is generally too large and taxes too high, I am grateful for the gas tax.
You should be, too. When Oregon instituted the first state tax on motor fuels in 1919, and North Carolina followed suit two years later, their leaders were solving a longstanding problem. Toll roads had been around for decades but struggled to cover their costs, in part because of rampant toll evasion. With automobile ownership surging North Carolina registered some 127,000 vehicles in 1920 state lawmakers could see the practical impossibility of accommodating the new traffic with roads funded by tolling.
So they had two choices. They could satisfy public demand for a massive road network by raising property taxes or some other generally applied tax. Or they could charge drivers themselves, by taxing the fuels their vehicles consumed. The latter option wasn’t a direct charge for using specific roads, like a toll. But unlike widespread tolling, widespread ga
Randal O’Toole Gets High-Speed Rail Wrong
Now that there’s decent chance of US investment in rail, Randal O’Toole is resurrecting his takes from the early Obama era, warning that high-speed rail is a multi-trillion dollar money sink. It’s not a good analysis, and in particular it gets the reality of European and Asian high-speed rail systems wrong. It displays lack of familiarity with rail practice and rail politics, to the point that most nontrivial assertions about rail in Europe and Asia are incorrect.
More broadly, the way O’Toole gets rail investment here wrong comes from making unexamined American assumptions and substituting them for a European or Japanese reality regarding rail as well as rail politics. If the US can’t do it, he thinks other countries can’t. Unfortunately, he’s even unfamiliar with recent work done on American costs, when he compares the Interstate system positively with recent high-speed rail lines.