Chambers takes on cyber-blackmailers in High Court lawgazette.co.uk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from lawgazette.co.uk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Vijay Mallya loses court battle in UK, to pay USD 90 mn in claims linked to Kingfisher Airlines
Vijay Mallya loses court battle in UK, to pay USD 90 mn in claims linked to Kingfisher Airlines
The Legal Claim Relates To A Leasing Agreement Between Kingfisher Airlines And Aircraft Leasing Company BOC Aviation Involving Four Planes, Of Which Three Were Delivered. PTI | Updated on: 12 Feb 2018, 08:14:41 PM
London/Singapore:
Embattled liquor tycoon Vijay Mallya has lost another legal battle linked to his now defunct Kingfisher Airlines after the UK High Court awarded Singapore-based BOC Aviation an estimated $90 million in claims.
The latest case involving the 62-year-old businessman, whose extradition case over alleged loan defaults amounting to around Rs 9,000 crores returns to Westminster Magistrates Court in London on March 16, is related to the leasing of aircraft by Kingfisher Airlines dating back to 2014.
Data protection: Representative liability lawgazette.co.uk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from lawgazette.co.uk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Subscription Notification
We have noticed that there is an issue with your subscription billing details. Please update your billing details here
Please update your billing information
The subscription details associated with this account need to be updated. Please update your billing details here to continue enjoying your subscription.
Your subscription will end shortly
Please update your billing details here to continue enjoying your access to the most informative and considered journalism in the UK.
Queen’s Bench DivisionPublished June 1, 2021Regina (Rose) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester PoliceBefore Judge Eyre QC[2021] EWHC 875 (Admin)Judgment April 19, 2021In considering whether a