BREAKING: 11th Circuit Holds Transmitting Data to Mail Vendor is Unauthorized Third-Party Disclosure Published on: 21 April 2021 at 03:00 p.m. ET April 21, 2021, 3 p.m. April 21, 2021, 3:10 p.m. insideARM.com The iA Institute
., No. 8:19-cv-983 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2019), the 11
th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments regarding whether the practice of using a mail house to send demand letters to consumers violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Today, the Court has given us their answer, holding that transmitting data to a mail house to generate and send demand letters to consumers does indeed violate the prohibition on third-party disclosure set forth in 15 USCA § 1692c(b).
Amtrak unveils proposed new route to Reading and Philadelphia
thereporteronline.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thereporteronline.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Dancing to Their Own Tune: Empowering Consumers Through Self-Service
insidearm.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from insidearm.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Does Sending Consumer Data to a Mail House Violate Third-Party Disclosure Rules? Published on: 15 March 2021 at 12:00 p.m. ET March 15, 2021, noon March 15, 2021, 12:12 p.m. insideARM.com The iA Institute
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00047155-eleventh-circuit-decide-whether-using-mai/
The practice of using a mail house to send demand letters to consumers is up for debate in the 11
th Circuit Court of Appeals. In 2019 insideARM first brought you the case of
th Circuit heard
In
Hunstein, the parties are squabbling over whether supplying a data file with consumer information to a mail house to prepare and mail a collection letter “relates to” the collection of a debt or whether sending such a file is “in connection with” the collection of a debt. While this may seem like the splitting of proverbial hairs, this distinction is significant: if providing consumer data to a mail house merely “relates to” the collection of
Agriculture
your username
March 4, 2021
Although settlements are starting to close some matters in the consolidated lawsuit purporting anticompetitive conduct in the chicken processing marketplace, some restaurants are just joining the matter, adding their allegations to many others. On Wednesday, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated filed a complaint in the matter, and on Monday a complaint was filed by Supply Management Services, Inc., a Georgia corporation which supplies Popeyeâs restaurants. Â
The Cheesecake Factoryâs complaint, which has been moved into the Northern District of Illinois consolidated matter, cited that the California-based company operates 294 restaurants in the United States and Canada. It has contracted with the defendants, which includes multiple chicken processing companies, to provide its supply of broiler chickens through its distributors Nealy Foods, Inc. and Halpernsâ Steak and Seafood Company. These distributors reportedly