comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - மறுக்க கோட் - Page 8 : comparemela.com

Bracing for Another E-book Price-Fixing Case

By Andrew Albanese | Jan 22, 2021 PW has prepared an explainer. Who is bringing the suit, and why? The suit is being brought against Amazon on behalf of three named plaintiffs and a potential class of consumers who bought e-books published by the Big Five “through a retail platform that competes with Amazon at a price inflated by Amazon and its Co-conspirator Publishers’ price restraint.” The suit was filed by Seattle-based firm Hagens Berman, which filed the first e-book price-fixing lawsuit against Apple and five of the then–Big Six publishers in August 2011. And we remember how that turned out: with a federal antirust suit and claims from 33 states. The publishers ended up settling all claims for a total of $166 million in consumer credits. Apple lost at trial a year later and paid out a $450 million settlement.

Shkreli Can t Pause Suit Pending Prison Release, Judge Says

A New York federal court on Friday denied "Pharma Bro" Martin Shkreli's request to stay discovery in the Federal Trade Commission and states' lawsuit against him until he is released from prison in 2023, stating that the 37-year-old had not shown "good cause" to stay the proceedings.

Martin Shkreli Loses Effort to Pause Antitrust Suit Over Daraprim Until He s Out of Jail

Martin Shkreli Loses Effort to Pause Antitrust Suit Over Daraprim Until He’s Out of Jail Adam Klasfeld © Provided by Law & Crime Ex-pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli speaks to the press in front of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York with members of his legal team after the jury issued a verdict on Aug. 4, 2017. Martin Shkreli cannot delay an antitrust suit that could lead to his lifetime ban from the pharmaceutical industry until his release from prison more than two years from now, a federal judge ruled. “Shkreli has not shown ‘good cause’ for a stay of this complex litigation,” U.S. District Judge Denise Cote ruled on Friday. “This action is brought by the federal government and several states. The parties and the public have a significant interest in resolving the issues raised by [state and federal regulators’] claims with due expedition. The issues principally arise from events that began years ago, in 2014.”

New York Federal Court Finds Force Majeure Clause Properly Invoked To Terminate Auction Consignment - Coronavirus (COVID-19)

Properly Invoked to Terminate Auction Consignment Contract On December 16, 2020, Judge Denise Cote of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an Opinion and Order holding, as a matter of first impression, that the Covid-19 pandemic was a “natural disaster” within the meaning of a  force majeure clause. Therefore, the Court held, an auction house was excused from performing a consignment contract. See  JN Contemporary Art LLC v. Phillips Auctioneers LLC, 2020 WL 7405262 (S.D.N.Y. 2020). Background In June 2019, JN Contemporary Act LLC (“JN”) and Phillips Auctioneers LLC (“Phillips”) entered into a consignment agreement, in which Phillips agreed to auction a

NY Federal Judge Rules COVID-19 Pandemic Constitutes Natural Disaster in Excusing Contract Performance | Morgan Lewis

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic constituted a “natural disaster” under a contract’s force majeure provision, Judge Denise Cote of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York recently ruled in JN Contemporary Art LLC v. Phillips Auctioneers LLC, No. 20-cv-4370, 2020 WL 7405262 (SDNY Dec. 16, 2020). This decision appears to be one of the first by a federal judge concerning such contractual language. Other courts may look to Judge Cote’s lengthy analysis of the meaning of the phrase “natural disaster” in this context when interpreting similar contractual language.

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.