Do you believe China poses a significant economic threat to our country?
Are you angry that the Wuhan coronavirus, a.k.a. COVID-19, was exported to America from a Chinese lab?
Are you upset enough about all of these and other things related to China and want to publicly express your God-given, constitutionally guaranteed opinion about these things?
Well, you’d better get ready to pay a legal price if you do, thanks to legislation just passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress and signed by a geriatric figurehead of a Democratic president.
According to news reports, the COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act was signed by Joe Biden on Thursday after surprisingly high bipartisan support in the House and Senate because, we’re told, ‘Asian hate crimes’ rose significantly during the pandemic (more on that in a moment).
https://www.afinalwarning.com/518403.html (Natural News) A Canadian professor has discovered that models that countries used as bases for Wuhan coronavirus lockdowns turned out to be problematic. He found that “a great majority” of these models were built on false assumptions. But some countries still insisted on implementing lockdown mandates grounded on these flawed models – which he found troubling.
Simon Fraser University (SFU) professor Doug Allen said in an interview that these early models “were built on a set of assumptions.” The university’s Burnaby Mountain Professor of Economics continued: “Those assumptions turned out to be really important, and the models are very sensitive to them, and they turn out to be false.”
Amid growing safety concerns, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Meryl Nass, on behalf of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), filed a Citizen Petition with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [.]
With more than 100 U.S. colleges mandating COVID vaccines for in-person attendance and schools enforcing mask mandates, it’s critical people understand their rights. (Article by Aimee Villella [.]
(Article by Art Moore republished from WND.com)
And the American College Health Association which recommends the vaccination requirement makes it clear that the main purpose is not to protect the students themselves. The protection is not for the young people, who have only a miniscule risk, but for the high-risk individuals in the surrounding community or wherever the students go in the “mass migration” at the end of the semester.
That’s a troubling shift in public policy, says Dr. Jane Orient, the executive director of Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.
Yet, Orient argued, young people can suffer death or serious disability after getting one of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines, which have not been fully approved by the FDA.