He was ordered to pay £359 in costs, a fine and surcharge.
ELLIE SMITH, 20, of Llandegfedd Way, New Inn, Pontypool, was ordered to pay £344 in costs, a fine and surcharge for without due care and attention. Her driving record was endorsed with six points.
CLAIRE PROSSER, 47, of Springfield, Maesycwmmer, Caerphilly, was conditionally discharged for 12 months after she admitted obstructing a constable. She was ordered to pay £322 in a fine and a surcharge.
READ MORE:
ROBERT DAVIES, 45, of Commercial Street, Newport, was jailed for seven days after he admitted that he failed to comply with supervision requirements imposed following his release from prison.
They join a growing number of people from across the city who see the ambitions for an outright ban on sexual entertainment venues (SEVs) as misguided and which could potentially push a regulated industry under the radar.
Pearce said: “I hope councillors won’t vote to fire these workers. They are legal venues and we have already got increasing unemployment. I would encourage the workers to unionise to better protect themselves from exploitative practices.”
Starr-Elliott added: “We should be looking to work with groups of these workers and venues for all sexes to secure safe working venues and rights not forcing it underground where the risks are higher!”
Mackay police are appealing for public assistance regarding investigations into an armed robbery that took place at a shopping centre on Phillip Street,.
The SDT ordered that the respondent should pay a fine of £8,000.
While in practice as a recognised sole practitioner at Attiyah Lone & Associates LLP and subsequently at AL Law & Associates Solicitors LLP, the respondent had acted improperly in respect of dealing with monies in which client C had an interest in that he had inappropriately caused or allowed to be transferred the sum of £24,043.28 from Attiyah Lone to firm B; he had inappropriately caused or allowed to be transferred the sum of approximately £80,560, alternatively approximately £73,000, from Attiyah Lone to his business account; and he had inappropriately caused or allowed to be transferred the sum of approximately £73,000 from his business account to firm B; thereby breaching principles 4, 6 and 10 of the SRA Principles 2011, failing to achieve outcome 5.3 of the SRA Code of Conduct 2011, and breaching rules 1.2(b), 13.1, and 14.1 of the SRA Accounts Rules 2011.