FPC Michigan Supreme Court Brief On University of Michigan Carry Ban Ammoland Inc. Posted on
FPS is challenging the University of Michigan’s campus-wide ban on carry. iStock-Artfully79-696928080.jpg
U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF) announced the filing of an important brief in the case of
Wade v. University of Michigan, currently before the Michigan Supreme Court. The brief, authored by FPC’s Director of Constitutional Studies Joseph Greenlee, FPC’s Adjunct Scholar George Mocsary, and FPC Legal Intern Nathan Cowper is available at www.FPCLegal.org.
Joshua Wade filed an action challenging the University of Michigan’s campus-wide ban on carrying firearms, alleging that the ban violated both the Michigan and U.S. Constitutions. Of particular importance is whether the University of Michigan is subject to the Michigan firearm preemption statute.
FPC Fires First in Two Appeals Challenging Gun Store COVID-19 Closures
ammoland.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from ammoland.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
House s George Floyd bill praised by family attorney, but activists push back - TheGrio
thegrio.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thegrio.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
FPC Challenge to Maryland’s “Assault Weapons” Ban Moves Up to Court of Appeals Ammoland Inc. Posted on
More Assaults on Maryland Gun Owners, iStock-884191290
U.S.A. –-(AmmoLand.com)- Firearm Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that FPC’s lawsuit challenging the State of Maryland’s ban on so-called “assault weapons,” Bianchi v. Frosh, is quickly moving up to the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
In the complaint, the “Plaintiffs acknowledge[d] that the result they seek is contrary to Kolbe v. Hogan,” a 2017 case in which the full Fourth Circuit inaccurately ruled that so-called “assault weapons” were not protected by the Second Amendment, “but that case was wrongly decided,” they argued. Thus, the plaintiffs “institute[d] this litigation to vindicate their Second Amendment rights and to seek to have Kolbe overruled.”
Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that the Court has taken its motion to intervene under consideration following a hearing in a federal lawsuit against ATF iStock 884191010
U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that the Court has taken its motion to intervene under consideration following a hearing in a federal lawsuit against ATF brought by the State of California, Giffords Law Center, and two individuals in a case seeking to force ATF to “conduct affirmative rulemaking regarding 80 percent receivers and frames in accordance with the GCA” and an injunction preventing the ATF “from implementing and enforcing ATF’s Classification Letters to Polymer80 (and other 80 percent receiver and frame manufacturers) and online guidance finding that 80 percent receivers and frames are not ‘firearms’ under the GCA.” The case,