comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - நீதிமன்றம் தீர்ப்புகள் - Page 6 : comparemela.com

Analysis: Here s what the Supreme Court and High Courts of India had to say this week

: Friday, February 26, 2021, 7:54 PM IST Analysis: Here s what the Supreme Court and High Courts of India had to say this week Supreme Court of India File Photo This segment highlights the important issues of the Indian Legal System of the week objectively and with a magnified legal lens factually. What made Headlines from the Supreme Court of India this week? 1. The Supreme Court has reserved orders in Justice V. Eswaraiah s plea challenging the order of Andhra Pradesh High Court directing probe into an alleged conspiracy against Supreme Court and High Court judges. What is this controversy really about? The Judge had the Supreme Court against an order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court whereby an investigation was sought to be conducted into a private conversation between himself and a suspended Munsif Magistrate. This conversation pertained to the alleged hatching of a ‘serious conspiracy’ against the High Court Chief Justice and a Senior sitting Judge of the Supr

EXCLUSIVE Multiple county court judgments made against Slater and Gordon

Numerous county court judgments (CCJs) have been made against Slater and Gordon, RollOnFriday can reveal. Since 2015, the firm has been subject to at least six CCJs. The most recent judgment, for £1,100, was handed down on 22 September last year and is shown on the register as still unsatisfied five months later. A spokesperson for Slater and Gordon said the record hasn t been updated and was incorrect , and insisted that  we don’t have any outstanding CCJs . Staff at both the Registry Trust, which operates the public register of CCJs, and at the County Court Money Claims Centre which dealt with the claim, were unable to confirm Slater and Gordon s assertion. However, they agreed it was possible that the debt had been settled and was not yet showing up on court records.

Australian Patent Law Update – The High Court Has Overturned Over 100 Years Of Law, Favouring The US Doctrine Of Exhaustion | International Lawyers Network

Seiko), manufactured and sold printer cartridges under the brand name ‘Epson’ ( Epson cartridges). The patented Epson cartridges were a single-use product, meaning that once the ink in the cartridge was depleted, it was necessary to dispose of, and replace, the entire cartridge. Ninestar Image (Malaysia) SDN BHD obtained empty Epson cartridges and modified them to enable the cartridges to be refilled. The Appellant, Calidad Pty Ltd ( Calidad) then purchased the modified cartridges and imported those cartridges into Australia for public sale. Calidad relied on the ‘implied licence’ doctrine to argue that they had not in fact breached Calidad’s patent, as an implied licence to use, maintain, import, export, resell or otherwise dispose of the Epson cartridges was applied to the product upon its first sale.

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.