Latest Breaking News On - நீதிமன்றம் கருத்து - Page 7 : comparemela.com

The Court of Appeals of Minnesota (“Court”) addressed in a February 8th Opinion an insurance company’s denial of coverage related to a herbicide containing the chemical glyphosate that was introduced into a mink farm water system. See Lang Fur Farms, Inc., et al. v. Bird Island-Hawk Creek Mutual Ins. Co., 2021 WL 416404. The denial of coverage was based on two exclusions in the insurance policy: • Chemical-or-Biological materials (“Chemical Exclusion”) • Anti-Concurrent-Causation Exclusion (“Anti-Concurrent Exclusion”) The Court’s Opinion provides that Lang Fur Farms and one of its owners (collectively “Lang Fur”) obtained an insurance policy in part from Bird Island – Hawk Creek Mutual Insurance Company (“Bird Island”).

Court opinionSee lang fur farms incHawk creek mutual insurance company bird islandAppeals of minnesota courtLang fur farmsIsland hawk creek mutualAnti concurrent causation exclusionBird islandHawk creek mutual insurance companyChemical exclusionLang furAnti concurrent exclusionநீதிமன்றம் கருத்துபார்க்க லாங் ஃபர் பண்ணைகள் இன்க்பருந்து க்ரீக் பரஸ்பர காப்பீடு நிறுவனம் பறவை தீவுமுறையீடுகள் ஆஃப் மினசோட்டா நீதிமன்றம்