comparemela.com

Page 21 - நீதி கெந்நெடீ News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The Supreme Court s Increasingly Dim View of the News Media

The Supreme Court’s Increasingly Dim View of the News Media A comprehensive look at references to the press in justices’ opinions revealed “a marked and previously undocumented uptick in negative depictions.” Conservative justices have always been more apt to write negatively about the press. But a new study found that now liberal justices also have little good to say about it.Credit.Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times April 19, 2021, 5:00 a.m. ET WASHINGTON — Last month, in a dissent in a routine libel case, a prominent federal judge lashed out at the news media. “Two of the three most influential papers (at least historically), The New York Times and The Washington Post, are virtually Democratic Party broadsheets,” wrote Judge Laurence H. Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. “And the news section of The Wall Street Journal leans in the same direction.”

They demanded Breyer, Retire but whom did he hire?

Tweet Demand Justice might have gained PR points for “being direct” in its campaign to shame Stephen Breyer into retirement … but apparently that’s all they gained. A week ago, the progressive activists sent a billboard truck around Washington DC with a prominent ad demanding “Breyer, Retire,” declaring that “it’s time for a Black woman Supreme Court justice.” HuffPo reporter Jennifer Bendery captured the moment one week ago: Here s a photo of Demand Justice s billboard truck outside of Union Station. pic.twitter.com/2N1Md9WSiV “There’s no time to waste,” the ad emphasized, and apparently Justice Breyer agreed with 

Packing SCOTUS remains a bonehead political blunder for Democrats

Packing SCOTUS remains a ‘bonehead’ political blunder for Democrats Updated Apr 16, 2021; This is an opinion column The only reason some Democrats want to change the number of justices on the United States Supreme Court is because Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton. As a senator in 1983, Joe Biden referred to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s court-packing effort as a “bonehead idea” and “terrible mistake” that eroded the independence of the Supreme Court. It remains so today, and it’s also a political gift for Republicans. If Hillary Clinton had filled the vacancies left by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, we wouldn’t be having the conversation about Supreme Court “reforms.” Democratic court-packers are singularly focused on delivering the judicial outcomes progressives want regardless of the cost to America.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.