The Move To Clean Government Raises Some Dirty Constitutional Questions.
By Emil Franzi Sean Zapata
LAST NOVEMBER, Arizona voters narrowly passed Proposition
200, the so-called Clean Elections Proposal, over surprisingly
minimal opposition. Ironically, while publicly attacking dirty
money, Prop 200 supporters were funded by almost a million
dollars worth of out-of-state cash. Apparently one person s special
interest is someone else s noble cause. For the record,
The Weekly vociferously opposed Prop 200.
We saw it as a classic case of making a bad situation current
campaign finance law even worse with a scheme that trades the
perceived tyranny of lobbyists checkbooks for the even scarier
tyranny of the academic mandarin.
Ask Sam Mailbag: free agency targets, Bulls draft prospects, and more
nba.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from nba.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Twenty-two defendants charged in connection with alleged $11 1 million Paycheck Protection Program fraud scheme
irs.gov - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from irs.gov Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
So go ahead and say whatever you want around all your networked devices, but don’t be surprised if bad things start happening.
I received another “Our Terms Have Changed” email from a Big Tech quasi-monopoly, and for a change I actually read this one. It was a revelation on multiple fronts. I’m reprinting it here for your reading pleasure:
We wanted to let you know that we recently updated our Conditions of Use.
What hasn’t changed:
Your use constitutes your agreement to our Conditions of Use.
We own all the content you create on our platform, devices and networks, and are free to monetize it by any means we choose.