During the court cases, Mr Power claimed that he would be forced to put the club into administration if he was unable to sell to American-registered firm Able Company Swindon LLC. There remains confusion over the club’s ownership, with claims that up to 50 per cent of Mr Power’s share in the club is held in trust for former Premier League ace Gareth Barry’s agent Michael Standing. An interim injunction, issued in 2019, prevents Mr Power from selling the club or shares in holding companies Swinton and Seebeck without Mr Standing’s permission. A full injunction hearing is expected to take place at the end of 2021 or early 2022. The trial hearing is likely to last up to five days.
Lee Power apparently preparing to sell Swindon Town, court told
thisiswiltshire.co.uk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thisiswiltshire.co.uk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
UK Financial Conduct Authority: High Court Finds That 24HR Trading Academy Unlawfully Advised On Investments And Unlawfully Promoted CFD Trading
mondovisione.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from mondovisione.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Judge rules Muslim woman should remove her veil while giving evidence at High Court
dailymail.co.uk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from dailymail.co.uk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
AA and BB [2021] EWFC 17
Decision of Mr Nicholas Cusworth QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge on 17 February 2021 considering Article 13 of the 1996 Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Cooperation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children (“The 1996 Convention”)
Before the Court was an application by the mother for a stay of the father s proceedings under Article 13 of the 1996 Convention on the basis of ongoing applications in Russia relating to the children s welfare.
The mother was born and raised in Russia. The father was born in Russia but moved to an EU member state as a child and was a national of that state. The parties had property in London and in Russia, where the mother s principal business interests lay. The parties had two children, both at school in London. At the time of the hearing there was litigation between the parties both in relation to the children an