Latest Breaking News On - தவறானது நாடகம் - Page 4 : comparemela.com

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Judge Paul Wallace of the Delaware Superior Court has held that a bump-up provision did not operate to preclude coverage for a settlement of a Section 14(a) cause of action. Two defense contracting firms agreed to enter into a self-described “merger,” in which one contractor merged into a subsidiary of the second contractor. After the transaction, stockholders filed a class action, alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. One set of stockholders alleged that, following the merger, the firm violated Section 10(b) when its executives disseminated false data about the firm’s financial health to mislead stockholders regarding the value of their investments. A second set of stockholders alleged that, prior to the merger, one of the firms violated Section 14(a) when its executives made false and misleading statements in proxy solicitation materials distributed before the

United statesPaul wallaceDelaware superior courtSecurities exchangeNorthrop grumman innovation sys incJudge paul wallaceGrumman innovation sysSecurities exchange actWrongful actஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில்பால் வாலஸ்டெலாவேர் உயர்ந்தது நீதிமன்றம்பத்திரங்கள் பரிமாற்றம்நார்த்ரோப் க்ரமந் கண்டுபிடிப்பு ஸிஸ் இன்க்நீதிபதி பால் வாலஸ்க்ரமந் கண்டுபிடிப்பு ஸிஸ்