Outrage After Pakistani Court Releases Convicted Murderer Of Journalist Daniel Pearl zerohedge.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from zerohedge.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Read later
Summary:
By now, most AI practitioners acknowledge the universal prevalence of bias, and the problem of bias in AI modeling. But what about fairness? Can fairness be measured via quantifiable metrics? Some say no - but this is where the debate gets interesting.
Bias is a universal trait among humans. It can be meaningless, or it can be dangerous. For example, I am biased about the Philadelphia Phillies baseball team. If a Phillies pitcher competes for the Cy Young Award at the end of the season, I am likely to extol the former s virtues and denigrate those of the latter. Unless I m a member of the Baseball Writers Associations who vote on such things, it makes no difference. It affects no one. It s harmless, and we all have them.
ISLAMABAD – The Supreme Court of Pakistan Wednesday noted that the Sindh government case about kidnapping and killing of Daniel Pearl, Bureau Chief of Wall Street Journal in Pakistan, seems to be weak, as there are many loopholes in it.
A three-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Mushir Alam conducted hearing of the appeals of Sindh government and the parents of Daniel Pearl against the SHC verdict to acquit the alleged murderers of Daniel Pearl. During the hearing, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood remarked that neither Mrs Pearl (Marianne) provided any evidence about the emails nor she came forward. He told the Sindh government prosecutor Farooq H Naek, “Sorry your (prosecution) case seems week.”