How Boosted went bust theverge.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from theverge.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Layoffs. Losses. Lawsuits. Rules are being rewritten for California healthcare giant
Sacramento Bee 1 hr ago Dale Kasler, The Sacramento Bee
Jun. 1 Sutter Health has been the pre-eminent hospital chain in Northern California for decades respected but also feared.
Popular Searches
Critics say it has strong-armed insurance companies and major employers into contract terms that inflated healthcare prices across the region. State officials blamed Sutter for making Sacramento the most expensive city in America for delivering a baby.
Now, this formidable organization with two dozen hospitals, 12,000 doctors and 3 million member patients is facing a reckoning over the way it does business.
Photo credits: Courtesy of Tik Tok
A Black woman and her daughter filed a lawsuit against an Uber driver and the ridesharing company this week after they said the driver repeatedly referred to them as “n rs.”
Mother’s Day weekend, South Carolina resident Jovene Milligan and her 30-year-old daughter Ghiana Gardner took a 59-mile trip in an Uber they described as a horrid experience that left them fearing for their safety, The State reports.
The mother and daughter duo were heading to Charleston from Atlanta for the weekend when their car broke down in Aiken, South Carolina. After contacting AAA, they were told they couldn’t ride in the tow truck due to COVID-19 safety protocols, forcing them to call an Uber.
Larkin Street Youth Services, which receives millions of dollars in public funding, is the defendant in three recent civil complaints — including in a lawsuit that alleges an employee coerced three women who worked there into having sex.
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
When a property owner suffers damage as a result of the actions of a public agency or public improvement, the owner typically pursues typical tort causes of action against the agency, along with a claim for inverse condemnation. While liability for the tort claims is decided by a jury, liability for inverse condemnation is determined by a judge. So what happens when both claims are pursued simultaneously should the judge rely on the jury’s determination of causation, or should the judge make his or her own findings?