comparemela.com

Page 13 - குடியேற்றம் முறையீடுகள் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Supreme Court shuts down attempt to treat asylum-seekers testimony as credible

Supreme Court shuts down attempt to treat asylum-seekers testimony as credible Nicholas Rowan © Provided by Washington Examiner The Supreme Court on Monday shut down an attempt to treat the testimony of asylum-seekers as credible, siding with the federal government against people seeking refuge in the country. The court unanimously found that a previous ruling from the California-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit had incorrectly ruled that in immigration cases, noncitizens testimonies must be treated as credible or true. The court vacated the 9th Circuit s decision and sent it back to lower courts for further consideration. In the case, two men, Cesar Alcaraz-Enriquez and Ming Dai, had sought to remain in the United States, but were found ineligible based on discrepancies in their testimony. Alcaraz-Enriquez was accused of lying about beating and raping his girlfriend. Dai was accused of omitting a visit to China when he claimed he was fleeing

Supreme Court Reverses 9th Circuit in Chinese Asylum Case

Supreme Court Rules Asylum Applicants Bear Burden of Proof, Reversing 9th Circuit Unanimously ruling against a Chinese asylum claimant, the Supreme Court reversed the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals this morning, finding immigration judges do not have to explicitly state that an asylum seeker’s story is not credible when finding against him. The court’s opinion in the case, Garland v. Dai, court file 19-1155, was written by Justice Neil Gorsuch. “The Ninth Circuit has long applied a special rule in immigration disputes,” Gorsuch wrote. “The rule provides that, in the absence of an explicit adverse credibility determination by an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals, a reviewing court must treat a petitioning alien’s testimony as credible and true.”

SCOTUS Unanimously Rules Against Ninth Circuit Rule that Gave Asylum to Previously-Denied Illegal Aliens

SCOTUS Unanimously Rules Against Ninth Circuit Rule that Gave Asylum to Previously-Denied Illegal Aliens Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images 1 Jun 2021 The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) on Tuesday held that federal courts have a limited role in reviewing immigration judge findings, reversing a decision from the Ninth Circuit appeals court that helped grant immigration relief to illegal aliens seeking asylum. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in a 9-0 decision that there is “nothing in the [Immigration and Nationality Act]” that “contemplates anything like the embellishment the Ninth Circuit has adopted” when deeming that an illegal alien’s testimony in an immigration case must be considered credible and true if not explicitly stated otherwise by an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.