Page 8 - கீப் ஆண்டர்சன் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Seaspiracy è la conferma che Netflix ha un problema con i documentari
rivistastudio.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from rivistastudio.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
From Filthy Rich to Thunder Force and Palm Springs: The best on demand TV to watch this week
dailymail.co.uk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from dailymail.co.uk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
What Seaspiracy gets right and wrong about eating fish
spectator.co.uk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from spectator.co.uk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Compelling Netflix doccie about impact of commercial fishing on marine life PREMIUM By John Harvey - 02 April 2021
One of the ways to measure the impact of a piece of content is to look at the blowback from those who do not come off well in the narrative.
This article is reserved for DispatchLIVE subscribers. Get access to ALL DispatchLIVE content from only R45.00 per month. Already subscribed? Simply sign in below. Already registered on HeraldLIVE, BusinessLIVE, TimesLIVE or SowetanLIVE? Sign in with the same details.
The Telegraph explores some of the most provocative claims in the 90-minute film
1 April 2021 • 12:32pm
One of the most controversial claims in the documentary is that the oceans will be empty of fish by 2048. This number stems from a 2006 paper, from which the lead author later distanced himself
Credit: Artgrid
The new Netflix documentary Seaspiracy has sparked a conversation about the conditions that produce the fish on our plates.
But it has been the target of criticism by marine conservationists, as well as the NGOs it condemns, for being misleading and failing to provide the full context to viewers.
Here, we explore some of the most controversial claims in the 90-minute documentary.