Finding the best ways to do good.
In 2017, climate scientist Kimberly Nicholas coauthored a study trying to answer this question: What are the most effective changes you can make to your lifestyle if you want to reduce your carbon footprint and help save the planet?
She found that for individuals in high-emitting countries, choices like flying less, driving less, and eating less meat are all helpful. But there’s another lifestyle choice that is much more effective over the long term: having fewer kids.
Yet in her new book,
Under the Sky We Make, Nicholas says that if you really want to be a parent, you should go ahead and have kids anyway.
What s worse for the climate crisis: Your child or your pet? euronews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from euronews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Carbon Offsets Can Really Make a Difference Here’s How AFAR 2 hrs ago
Photo by Adrián Portugal
The Alto Mayo Protected Forest has seen much human encroachment, but money from carbon credits is funding alternative projects.Carbon offsets are a complicated and often misunderstood proposition. They’re no substitute for reducing our carbon emissions at the source. As Kimberly Nicholas insists in the must-read
Under the Sky We Make: How to Be Human in a Warming World a book that combines unassailable facts with personal anecdotes and a plan for action the best way to reduce our individual footprints is to go flight-, car-, and meat-free.
Readers respond to an article by Polly Toynbee about population decline
‘Would it be so disastrous for it to fall back to something approaching the population level of our grandparents’ era?’ asks Kathleen Roberts. Photograph: Justin Tallis/AFP/Getty Images
‘Would it be so disastrous for it to fall back to something approaching the population level of our grandparents’ era?’ asks Kathleen Roberts. Photograph: Justin Tallis/AFP/Getty Images
Letters
Wed 21 Apr 2021 13.15 EDT
Last modified on Wed 21 Apr 2021 14.03 EDT
Polly Toynbee’s view of our demographic changes is disappointingly shortsighted and narrow (Britain’s falling birthrate will damage our society – and it’s not just Covid to blame, 20 April). Of course we should be concerned if economic policies are pricing some people out of childbearing, but that shouldn’t blind us to the very real advantages of fewer people.