Article content
Premium Fire Protection Ltd. was fined $225,000 for 15 counts under the Safety Codes Act. The company was also issued a 20 per cent victim fine surcharge, according to a City of Calgary news release. Kurt Bertrand, the company’s president, was fined $25,000 and issued the same surcharge for four violations of the Alberta Fire Code.
We apologize, but this video has failed to load.
Try refreshing your browser, or Okotoks company fined $270,000 for fire code violations Back to video
Judge Allan Fradsham last month found Premium used unqualified employees to conduct inspections, maintenance and installation of equipment, and failed to show due diligence to ensure it didn’t happen.
Company fined $270K, president fined $30K for Alberta Fire Code violations calgary.ctvnews.ca - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from calgary.ctvnews.ca Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
CALGARY Calgary and much of the southern and eastern regions of the province are under a heat warning and the dry conditions have greatly increased the risk of wildfire devastation. The Canadian Wildland Fire Information System has much of the province in red, indicating extreme fire risk in dry zones . The dry conditions increase the likelihood a wildfire or grass fire will spread quickly, intensify and become difficult to control.
Interactive maps from Natural Resources Canada currently do not have any active fire hotspots in the areas of Alberta where temperatures have eclipsed 30 C. There are three hotspots active in the province as of Thursday, none of which are under heat warnings.
Пожежа знищує ліси Канади gazeta.ua - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from gazeta.ua Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Four bids have been received in answer to the request for proposals – three are for bored tunnels and the other is for an immersed structure.
Azzopardi said this alternative, submitted by the only Maltese consortium, had not been rejected because IM had been advised that restricting the proposals to bored tunnels might give rise to appeals that would delay the tendering process.
He explained that IM’s conceptual design was for a 14-kilometre horseshoe-shaped tunnel running underground and under the seabed between l-Imbordin, in St Paul’s Bay, and a road near Kenuna Tower, in Nadur.
But this was not the final design or technology – whether bored or immersed. That would only be determined once bidders who satisfied the criteria passed the first phase of the evaluation process and moved to the second phase.