Latest Breaking News On - ஆராய்ச்சி நேர்மை - Page 5 : comparemela.com
Employee of the Quarter Mike Sanderson is UCCS carbon monoxide detector – UCCS Communique
uccs.edu - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from uccs.edu Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Geert Dales: In de Tweede Kamer is wegkijken de norm geworden
liwwadders.nl - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from liwwadders.nl Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
● Assessing potential research integrity concerns arising in manuscripts under consideration, and in published articles.
● Preparing and editing correction and retraction notices.
● Consulting editorial board members.
● Contacting other journals/publishers.
● Cover for the Editorial team when required.
● A minimum of 1-2 years’ experience in the publishing industry.
● Degree in a scientific discipline (in addition to life sciences and physical sciences we are interested in people with a computer science, mathematics or engineering background), further degree a plus.
● Knowledge of peer review and the publishing process.
● An interest in Open Access publishing, ethics, integrity and the editorial process.
● Experience in a customer-facing role or using CRM software and/or manuscript tracking systems is preferred.
Wary EU vows to keep its research open to most of the world | Science
sciencebusiness.net - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from sciencebusiness.net Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
The infamous Piltdown Man skull. Photograph: Rischgitz/Getty
If you read about scientific fraud in the recent news, it would seem that there is much to worry about. It’s on the rise, apparently! There has been a 10-fold increase in the number of retracted papers since the 1970’s, and a number of these are due to fraud or suspected fraud.
An investigation of retractions from the biomedical scientific literature database PubMed published in the prestigious
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA (PNAS) found that a whopping 63.2% of health- and life-science related retractions were due to fraud, suspected fraud or plagiarism, with good old honest error retractions in the sound minority. This sounds scary – especially the ‘suspected fraud’. Is this just the tip of the scientific deceit iceberg? Just how many lies are lurking in the scientific literature?