comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - அவ்ரோ லான்காஸ்டர் - Page 12 : comparemela.com

Bombers Often Don t Work - 5 Worst Ever

Bombers Often Don t Work - 5 Worst Ever The very best aircraft have been those that could not only conduct their primary mission effectively, but that were also sufficiently flexible to perform other tasks that might be asked of them. Here s What You Need To Remember: Many bombers have limited roles, but fill them excellently. The Ju-88 Stuka, for instance, had virtually no capacity for fighting - but it was still one of the most feared aircraft of the Second World War. Others, such as the B-52, are more versatile. Bombers are the essence of strategic airpower. While fighters have often been important to air forces, it was the promise of the heavy bomber than won and kept independence for the United States Air Force and the Royal Air Force. At different points in time, air forces in the United States, United Kingdom, Soviet Union, and Italy have treated bomber design and construction as a virtually all-consuming obsession, setting fighter and attack aviation aside.

Russia Built a Mach 3 Super Bomber (Almost)

It was meant to wipe out the U.S. Navy. Check out all of Moscow s military dreams.  Here s What You Need to Remember: Many of the Soviet bombers of the post-war era were direct analogues to US types.  The Tu-4, in fact, was a direct copy of captured American B-29s. The Sukhoi T-4 was the USSR’s answer to the B-70 Valkyrie.  A massive, incredibly fast bomber capable of high altitude flight, the T-4 tested (and in many ways exceeded), the limits of the Soviet Union’s defense industry. Designed to hit Mach 3, with a service ceiling of around 70,000’, the T-4 resembled the B-70 visually, and in capability.  However, because the organization of airpower in the Soviet Union differed from that of the United States, T-4s were also considered for tactical missions, such as reconnaissance and the delivery of anti-ship missiles.  The idea of a T-4 carrying Kh-22 anti-ship missiles is very scary indeed. 

The M1 Garand Has a Great Kill Record: It Beat Nazi Germany, Italy, and Japan

The M1 Garand Has a Great Kill Record: It Beat Nazi Germany, Italy, and Japan The M-1 had a significant advantage over the bolt-action rifles used by the other Allied and enemy armies because of its semiautomatic mechanism. Here s What You Need to Remember: Although soldiers groused and kidded about the weight of the M-1, Garand’s weapon gave stout service wherever it was carried. Often making the difference between life and death for the men on the front lines, it played a vital tactical role and, ultimately, a decisive role in the Allied victory over the forces of Nazi Germany, Italy, and Japan.

Wrecked: How the British Took Down the Nazi Battleship Tirpitz

Operation Catechism was a daring mission to destroy one of Hitler s finest warships. Key point: Although Germany twice in two world wars tried beat the British Navy, they failed. Here is how London ensured it remained the leading naval power of Europe. April 1, 1939, was a red-letter day in the history of the reborn German Kriegsmarine for two key reasons. First, Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler presented the fleet’s chief, Erich Raeder, with an ornate, icon-studded Navy blue baton of office as the first grand admiral since the days of the Kaiser Wilhelm II. This was done with great ceremony and a gala luncheon afterward aboard the new battle cruiser Scharnhorst, anchored on Jade Bay in the former Imperial port of Wilhelmshaven. Second, the Kriegsmarine christened and launched the Third Reich’s newest and most modern battleship, the Tirpitz, on the same day. The Tirpitz, the last battleship the Third Reich would build, was the sister ship to the Bismarck. But the Tirpitz was heav

The Biggest Weapons Never Built: Russia Edition

The Soviet military combined grandiose vision and global aspiration with a defense-industrial base that had severe limitations.  Here s What You Need To Remember: Some of these weapons would have dominated the battlefield - if the cash-strapped Soviet state could have afforded them. On the other hand, some would have likely been a tremendous waste of already-limited resources. For nearly seven decades, the defense-industrial complex of the Soviet Union went toe-to-toe with the best firms that the West had to offer.  In some cases, it surprised the West with cheap, innovative, effective systems.  In others, it could barely manage to put together aircraft that could remain in the air, and ships that could stay at sea.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.