- Bruce( no not him) - Monday, May 3, 21 @ 10:34 am:
I don’t know. Maybe if there was a deeper look, there might be enough to justify full time.
Seems to be several Fed investigations, that have something to do.
Maybe also put the office in a location not very visible to legislators…
Every public servant in management or decision making capacities has hear the trope “perception is reality.” The question has always been how to deal with that perception. Do you do something that wastes taxpayer money to deal with a perception or do you try and change that perception? Obviously, the specific approach varies depending on the facts involved. All to often when politicians are involved the easy answer is to make it look like you are doing something regardless of efficacy.
Rich Miller: Political losses mount for Gov Pritzker randolphcountyheraldtribune.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from randolphcountyheraldtribune.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Your 5th & 3rd to last paragraph summarize it very well. Pritzker seems too much an activist & not enough a politician. For example, he didn’t seem chaistened by the Fair Tax loss like John Kasich wisely did when a ballot initiative undid SB5.
- Flyin Elvis -Utah Chapter - Monday, Mar 8, 21 @ 9:56 am:
Will Dems like this “loser’s” money come next year?
One word describes JB- Arrogant. His chances at reelection given its Illinois are still good but it would be nice if Pritzker acted less like the Billionaire he is-
Great read, boils it down.
“Make no waves, back no losers”
Pritzker had better figure out why his political losses keep happening suntimes.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from suntimes.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
To say the the governor in his political calculus has seen setbacks is an understatement.
The Durbin flipping on Harris for Kelly, in the end, what is fascinating to watch is the seemingly unknown to where the votes (weighted) and noses were, as why would anyone want a vote without already knowing where everyone stood?
Durbin turning on both Duckworth and Pritzker, Durbin used some leverage to the de-centralizing aspect to Pritzker running the shop? Ok, then if Durbin is seen as the power behind all things state party, what makes Pritzker want to be someone willing to aid… anyone, frankly?