Than liebermann at the pentagon and this cnn jessica gino campuses across the country today as protests against the war in gaza spread at major universities an Indiana State Police in Riot Gear Carrying Shields and batons were seen clashing with Iu Bloomington students. Theyre on campus. Police say they arrested at least 26 people after they ignored six verbal warnings to leave in Northern California are hard closure is underway at the Cal Poly Humboldt campus after protesters took over two university buildings, there administrators say no one is allowed to enter or stay on campus without permission. The University Says classes will be virtual for the rest of the Semester Demonstrators across the country want their schools to stand against what they believe are acts of genocide being committed against the Palestinian People in gaza. But some jewish students worry the protests are becoming antisemitic that they lead to harassment and they fear for their safety on campus were covering th
Im period in question. I thought in many what we did a concession at all was Michael Dreeben essentially admitting the attorney for the special counsels office, essentially admitting that these facts were so inextricably intertwined in a colloquy with justice barrett, that it would be very difficult to separate them out on remand. Thats how i interpret for his statements at least. Well, and to translate that for people watching, that means that basically, if it wasnt official act, they would not be able to use that potentially at trial. He was arguing they should be able to use it to paint a bigger picture. But trump has argued, total immunity. He has not said, well, some of these are private x this would mean the case could at least in part go forward and go to trial. We believe that without the official acts charged in the indictment, there is no case. Weve been very consistent in our position from the start, starting with the District Court proceeding through the circuit. Now at the
Concession at all. Was Michael Dreeben essentially admitting the attorney for the special counsels office, essentially admitting that these facts were so strikingly intertwined in a colloquy with Justice Barrett that it would be very difficult to separate them out on remand. Thats how i interpreted his statements, at least. Well, and to translate that for people watching, that means that basically, if it wasnt official act, they would not be able to use that potentially at trial. He was arguing they should be able to use it to paint a bigger picture. But trump has argued, total immunity. He has not said, well, some of these are private x. This would mean the case could at least in part go forward and go to trial. We believe that without the official acts charged in the indictment, there is no case. Weve been very consistent in our position from the start, starting with the District Court proceeding through the circuit. Now at the the us Supreme Court, that what were talking about is ab
The Supreme Court hears arguments in his Immunity Claim also tonight, live reports from the University Campuses at the end of a day that saw propalestinian demonstrations spread and grow plus arizona, were say lawmakers are trying again to undo their recently revivim nir total abortion ban dating back to the civil war. Good evening. Tomorrow morning. The former president is back in court here in new york for the first full de, a Prosecution Testimony in the Hush Money Criminal Trial on time. Trump friend and former tabloid publisher, david pecker will be back on the stand, expected to continue laying out the socalled catch and kill scheme at this center of this case. Meantime, the judge, juan merchan could rule on the prosecutions motion and to hold trump in contempt for his attacks on witnesses, notably Michael Cohen, his former lawyer and fixer, who made the payments to Stormy Daniels, which has boss allegedly hd through misleading Business Records the defendants meant some of his da
Right now cnns Breaking News and a breaking new cnn special live coverage of this history defining moment in to courtrooms very shortly, the Supreme Court will hear arguments over whether a president has absolute immunity. Were talking of course, about donald trump in the january he six case, a new york jury will hear arguments for the man who ran the National Enquirer. He is expected to deliver testimony, right out of the gate this morning about efforts to bury stories about playboy playmate. Is good, ultimately get to the xu of what happened. Stormy daniels, im john berman with kate bolduan this morning. Sara sidner is out. We have a live look at the us Supreme Court not yet. We will have a live look at the us Supreme Court at some point, you can trust me on that. We are standing by for Oral Arguments at the court about the issue of whether donald trump is immune from the actions he took around january 6, of course, he is trying to get the Election Subversion Case, the federal Electi