Mr. Magu to request the Panel to summon the
AGF to prove the allegations. After some reluctance, the Panel issued a subpoena on the
AGF to testify at the Panel, but the
AGF, blatantly ignored the summons. In the absence of the vital evidence of the
AGF the Panel decided to listen to suspects charged with serious economic and financial crimes by the
EFCC under the leadership of
Mr. Magu. Of course no sooth sayer is needed before one would know that such witnesses have an axe to grind with
Magu and therefore, their evidence will, most likely, be tainted. Expectedly, the witnesses were reported to have given evidence against Mr. Magu. Although, the law is trite that evidence which ought to be given but is not given will be presumed to be against the person who refused to give such evidence if given. See