Down ferguson last week. he has now apologized for his actions, saying his emotions got the better of him last night. but he s saying he should not be blamed for the country s condition after the grand jury s decision. this guy should be given a pass, he admits that he shouldn t have said it. i can t even fathom the idea of putting this guy before a grand jury. talk about inducing more riots. i just find it amazing. you can say what you want when you want to say it. there are limits, you can t yell fire in a crowded theater, you can t yell bomb on an airplane. because it creates possible injury. he s basically saying the same thing, he s yelling fire in a crowded movie theater. he s saying burn the city down, and maybe people got agitated
Down ferguson last week. he has now apologized for his actions, saying his emotions got the better of him last night. but he s saying he should not be blamed for the country s condition after the grand jury s decision. this guy should be given a pass, he admits that he shouldn t have said it. i can t even fathom the idea of putting this guy before a grand jury. talk about inducing more riots. i just find it amazing. you can say what you want when you want to say it. there are limits, you can t yell fire in a crowded theater, you can t yell bomb on an airplane. because it creates possible injury. he s basically saying the same thing, he s yelling fire in a crowded movie theater. he s saying burn the city down, and maybe people got agitated and they may have hurt people.
Eye, if red eye had a guest on, we don t have the budget to actually blur your face. you d have to put your hand in front of your face like this and change your voice. i would not do that but the other person that said that would. i condemn him. here s the thing. i ll open this up to the table. we live in a time where we re absolutely intolerant of halloween costumes or off colored jokes or anything considered offensive to specific groups but somehow not this. slightly hypocrite cal? extremely. i don t think so. there s a different level of seriousness. that s what i m saying. they re okay with this. you mean that they say first amendment, blah. i m totally on your side on that. there are many times in the history of this country where the first amendment has said it doesn t apply to that. privacy and security, yelling
Eye, if red eye had a guest on, we don t have the budget to actually blur your face. you d have to put your hand in front of your face like this and change your voice. i would not do that but the other person that said that would. i condemn him. here s the thing. i ll open this up to the table. we live in a time where we re absolutely intolerant of halloween costumes or off colored jokes or anything considered offensive to specific groups but somehow not this. slightly hypocrite cal? extremely. i don t think so. there s a different level of seriousness. that s what i m saying. they re okay with this. you mean that they say first amendment, blah. i m totally on your side on that. there are many times in the history of this country where the first amendment has said it doesn t apply to that. privacy and security, yelling
But when you re condescending and you don t even have the facts right, when you re misstating what the second amendment says, as interpreted, by the conservative supreme court by scalia, i have a problem with that. yeah. reverend al, later in the hearing senator feinstein said the first amendment doesn t stop us from regulating some forms of speech like child pornography. other democrats pointed out the first amendment doesn t protect people from yelling fire in a crowded theaters but would not be a violation of the second amendment to prevent someone from bringing a hundred round magazine into a crowded theater. according to the washington post feinstein later apologized to cruz but explained she felt, quote, patronized by his remarks. he was patronizing. i agree with joe on this point. if he wants to argue against the findings in the court that heldlettheld helder