that, mark.wo if i thought mueller was acting in good faith, i would say, all right, maybe it maybe worth doing at that point if it is limited in scope. the problem is, mark, there is no evidence of that. mike flynn sat down with investigators from the case with no lawyer. the fbi went back, admitted there were no signs of deception. they then prosecuted him for what? for lying to the fbi. does that make any sense? there is no good faith effort here at all. mark: no, and i am absolutely opposed to this whole lying to the fbi thing. i think that is disgraceful. dan, i do want to get this in. despite allegedly being under russian control, president trump s administration just slapped new sanctions on russia in response to the nerve agent poisoning of a former russian agent and his daughter in the u.k., and the sanctions will kick in later this month. actually, another young woman over in britain subsequently died of this poison. so trump is acting against putin
that i would hardly second and endorse. she knows nothing about economics. she actually said that the unemployment rate is so low under trump because everyone has two jobs. there is no reasoning, no rationale. mark: you know that, lou paid 50% of the country has two jobs, that is full employment. it makes sense. about is march sense of the far left ever makes. and to think that she is aware that there is, as she put it, it s happening, there is something happening. she keeps talking about it. no one has talked about a descriptive label. mark: i think it is better to leave it as vague. when you pin down the something what is interesting about it, she was a star. she kind of burst out on the scene. she was the new star, and it s clear she s not star quality.
he doesn t care about transgender bathrooms. he doesn t care about race. a lot of his family are jewish. yet he is apparently a neo-nazi, anti-semitic, racist, lgbtq community s are cowering fear. what is it, and the water, fluoride, what is going on? you need to trust your leader, have faith in your leader as a human being to have faith in their vision, to understand their vision. where the dialogue breaks down as if you don t have faith in your leader, you don t even want to hear their vision. and people trump has been treating at his opponents, people who don t support his political views, have trump derangement syndrome. in any kind of argument you are having with somebody, it shuts off the argument, lately if you tell the other side they are crazy. mark: just being clear on that now. you re saying that when the president by the president accusing the naysayers of having trump derangement syndrome, he
he can talk about jews feminizing if i talked abouty jews feminizing black men byei putting chemicals in the marijuana, i would be off facebook, boom, like that, first by suggesting it is possible to feminize black men and it is possible that black men are on marijuana and that jews are trying to feminize that is circles within circles. i would be gone instantly. perhaps. i think the fundamental thing we have to think about is that facebook, google, twitter, they are privately owned companies. if they believe that someone ha, violated their terms and conditions of use, then they can remove them. i would suggest if you have ann issue with farrakhan being on that platform, you should, like you said, write letters, email. i guarantee you with enough economic pressure, they will probably remove the video or remove that person.. mark: we are beyond economic pressure.
if mueller tries to subpoena him, he is going to have a very, very tough time, because according to what we know publicly, there is no conducty, involving the president, there is no russian collusion, there is no crime involving collusion. so what is the reason that mueller wants to talk to him? it is very obvious. he wants to talk to him for purposes of writing a report and then referring the matter to mr. rosenstein to refer towr congress for impeachment. the use of a grand jury subpoena to get testimony from a president for use in anus impeachment proceeding is illegal and unconstitutional. mark: just to be clear on that, you would take the view that if there was any serious wrongdoing by the president, we would already know it, and that the main object here is just to