He can express any views he was. Wants. The big mistake was not recusing himself. When he tweeted he would make sure trump doesnt become president and has an insurance policy, he could not be fair and just. By not recusing himself, he violated his position of trust. I would not go too far and blame it on the top authorities of the fbi. They didnt know. When they did know, they demoted him and took him out of the investigation. I think its a blemish, but i dont think its a fatal flaw in the investigation. I think there are deeper and more fatal flaws. Ultimately i think it was the right decision. Tucker dont those texts suggest why he didnt recuse himself . Its one thing to express a political opinion. Do i it for a leaving. Living. He was suggesting that his opinions would drive the crimmial investigation that he was conducting. Thats subversion of justice. Thats the issue. He denied under oath that in any way he was influenced by his hatred for thump in any of his professional decisio
responded and twitter doesn t tell you why you are banned. i received an automated response saying something i had written incited people to silence through fear. one tweet that was cited was an attempt at a bad joke. i wrote something about someone coming to eat your face. that apparently consists of violence the same way you tell someone to jump in the lake that consists of an invitation to go swimming. tucker: do you think if you were advocating for war with iran, you would have been banned? absolutely. advocating for war is acceptable within twitter s boundaries. the two people banned along side me. the president of rand paul