that roger stone has a lot of bluster and issues that he may not have direct knowledge. and not a lot of credibility. but that just adds to the list. now paul manafort has no more credibility as a witness at all because there is an entire cast of characters here who are not credible. these are not truth telling people. they have repeatedly lied to investigators. nearly everybody charged in the special counsel s investigation has included some kind of charge of lying to federal investigators or prosecutors. paul manafort experienced back before his virginia trial he had been pulled back from his supervised release because he was accused of witness tampering and making false statements. he had been witness tampering, writing op-eds when he was in detention does it surprise you the number of people who have lied to investigators in this case? it has been a number of people charged with lying. it speaks to the type of people.
credible. these are not truth telling people. they have repeatedly lied to investigators. nearly everybody charged in the special counsel s investigation has included some kind of charge of lying to federal investigators or prosecutors. paul manafort experienced back before his virginia trial he had been pulled back from his supervised release because he was accused of witness tampering and making false statements. he had been witness tampering, writing op-eds. does it surprise you the number of people who have lied to investigators in this case? it has been a number of people charged with lying. it speaks to the type of people. these were many people aff affiliated with the trump campaign. one has to say that is a lot of people. i m not a lawyer, but you hear one individual lying. it just seems like that was the kind of go-to thing to just lie. it is and knowing that this
at first. you offer up four crimes at the outset of your piece there, and i ll offer up another one, federal bribery. i ve been jumping up and down for months, as you know, writing op-eds and tweeting out that federal bribery statue, 15-year offense, criminalizes a this for that exchange. dirt on hillary in exchange for a promise to lift or reduce sanctions on russians, that is a classic quid pro quo. as you and i talked about in the past, because that bribery statue has that unique language that makes it applicable to people sworn into office and candidates, it puts it right in the whole house of this meeting. and that hammer of the 15-year penalty is far greater than conspiracies to defraud the united states or election campaign finance violations. and that s the kind of hammer federal bribery, and it can be a predicate for reco, on a services fraud, even 20-year offenses. that s the kind of crime federal
on the other hand, i m happy to be a private citizen, coming on your show, writing op-eds. i have a book coming out in april, apparently it s a longer process than i anticipated. i ve enjoyed all of that. he s doing great without me. if he needed me to help, i would. there was a political article that was an attempt to re-raise allegations from my 30-year-old divorce, there was never any contact between me and the white house. there was no job offer, there was no discussion. i was there in october, they said i was there recently. i went and had lunch with a friend of mine. the article was just i don t want to use that two-word phrase that gets used so often, but i think it was a cheap shot. a cheap shot. all right. heads up, white house landscaper, andy puzder wants to show up to mow the lawn, you re screwed, buddy. andy, thank you so much for joining me, i appreciate it. always a pleasure, stephanie. the dow is up after a record day after. it broke through the 26,000
senator lankford and tim scott, writing op-eds. these two they re a very interesting pair. they have these sunday conversations, trying to heal issues of the racial divide. with mixed communities coming together in someone s home. the big question for these sunday conversations for this pair, the senatorial pair is would you have someone from another race in your home? what they do is practice this sunday conversations issue. they have been coming out. but the leadership i mean, tim scott is a leader. he was one of the core four when it came to tax reform. but we need the leadership to say something. if donald trump, no matter if he s as the naacp says, he s racist or what have you, he is the president of all america. he says he s the president of all america, not his base, not trump land, not white america, not rural america, not just the forgotten man, but all america,