court here, the fifth circuit there s still really dealing with the merits of this case they ve set up a really fast tracked briefing schedule on this, and they re scheduled to hear arguments in this case in just about one month. so the takeaway that i m just getting now via paper that i ve just been handed is that the supreme court has in fact, extended this stay, meaning they are extending, putting the lower court ruling on hold, meaning everything remains status quo. there will be no changes to the way that the abortion pill is administered. good news for a lot of doctors and patients who are bracing for any change is good news for the fda and the justice department for us so i can come back with you as i know a little bit more detail. but that s the big takeaway here is that the supreme court is really keeping things as they are. while all of these legal wranglings play out below forest and just to just to clarify, have we gotten word on exactly how long this stay is going to last?
to require a major shift in the way that our intelligence agencies and our national security agencies talk i think it s likely that a lot less is going to be able to be put down on paper, to be sent in emails there s going to have to be a lot more that s done person-to-person because we re having a hard time controlling all this information, and people who want to damage the united states are finding that it is not that hard to get this information, leak it, and put our national security officials in a really difficult position this is embarrassing it s bad, but we ve got to change practice at some point. senator, before we let you go, can i ask you about another frontier in the cultural and political battles taking place in the u.s it is interesting to hear your cautious optimism around guns. i wonder what you re thinking on the issue of abortion, with the latest legal wranglings over mifepristone it is one thing when outsiders look at this country the two things they keep mentionin
they re fighting over a guy, you know, no one wants to storm the ramparts for what republican leader is? our sport is kicking the crap out of our own leadership. the democrats have, you know, there s been internal wranglings here but ultimately you uplift your leaders and uplifted nancy pelosi but we are like crabs in a bucket. we have been for 12 year, one clients to the top and everybody tries to drag him down. by the way, there are consequences to that attitude and we re seeing it today. but also consider that nancy pelosi, i mean, there s also a generational issue going on here with these the five of the 20. i have to remember my numbers, right, in terms of how they view what their job really is. they view their job as getting clicks, raising money, creating chaos. not actually legislating. mission accomplished. mission accomplished. but they re not interested in legislating. pelosi understood where her caucus was, how to get people what they wanted, what they needed.
wranglings that continue in washington. but here city officials and county officials say that they are preparing as if title 42 is going to be lifted. there was a state of emergency order issued over the weekend. folks here say that they re really focused on opening up more shelter space and food situation, medical supplies, whatever might be needed. city officials and county officials are talking up opening several warehouses even unused schools to could house temporarily migrants as they move on to other destinations in the united states but, pam, also the big news of the day is how things have dramatically changed on the riverfront in el paso between el paso and juarez, an area where many migrants, thousands of migrants have crossed in the last week or so and this morning, texas national guard and state troopers started erecting almost a mile-long chain link fence with barbed wire. this is a dramatic change and not a welcome change by from what we re hearing initially in
which was at first rejected by the board before they finally accepted. so, to work at twitter during this entire takeover, the process was an incredibly stressful and just a chaotic experience. elon musk began the takeover process, his first takeover bid happened in april, and then he attempted to back out of the deal and then all of a sudden it was back on. for that entire time, employees were deeply suspicious of his takeover plans. he was speaking publicly about things like content moderation. he was publicly disparaging the product. as melissa said, in may of this year, musk tried to back out of the deal. twitter sued musk for backing out, musk countersued twitter. legal wranglings continued until musk officially took over twitter on october the 28th.