unit on the website, and i believe that is done through the national crime agency. is that correct? tt is crime agency. is that correct? it is centralised? crime agency. is that correct? it is centralised? that s crime agency. is that correct? te 3 centralised? that s correct. crime agency. is that correct? it is centralised? that s correct. at - crime agency. is that correct? it is | centralised? that s correct. at what oint do centralised? that s correct. at what point do the centralised? that s correct. at what point do the police centralised? that s correct. at what point do the police take centralised? that s correct. at what point do the police take a centralised? that s correct. at what point do the police take a missing l point do the police take a missing person seriously? point do the police take a missing person seriously? when somebody is re orted person seriously? when somebody is reported missing. person seriously? when somebody is reported missing, the p
significant impacts further down the line? in significant impacts further down the line? ., ., , ., ., , significant impacts further down the line? ., ., , ., ., ., , line? in ma or investigations of any sort, line? in major investigations of any sort. whether line? in major investigations of any sort, whether be line? in major investigations of any sort, whether be a line? in major investigations of any sort, whether be a missing - line? in major investigations of anyi sort, whether be a missing person, line? in major investigations of any l sort, whether be a missing person, a homicide, the work of a serial killer, the messaging is absolutely vital. it s got to be accurate. it s got to be precise and it s got to engage the public. unfortunately here with lancashire police, way back at one of their early press conferences when their uniform super intention said a working hypothesis is that nicola has gone into the water, that is what the evidence tells us. well, everybody wanted
some people have suggested, they never ruled out the involvement of a third party, they have never ruled out the possibility that nicola may have left of her own volition. but their working hypothesis, based on their working hypothesis, based on the information that they had, you have to make a very clear, nobody else, whether speculators, former colleagues of mine, whether it is people online, nobody else has had that information and the police, based on information they had, that is their main hypothesis. is their main hypothesis. thank you ve much is their main hypothesis. thank you very much for is their main hypothesis. thank you very much for your is their main hypothesis. thank you very much for your expertise - is their main hypothesis. thank you very much for your expertise and i very much for your expertise and sharing your time with us today. thank you, let us cross straight to st michael s on wyre and our correspondent who is there on the scene. update us, please come o
it has been two weeks of hell. right now, it is as though she has vanished into thin air. like, yeah, just insane. police have consistently called this a missing persons inquiry. there is no evidence of a crime. our main working hypothesis, therefore, is that nicola has sadly fallen into the river, that there is no third party or criminal involvement, and that this is not suspicious, but a tragic case of a missing person. but that has not stopped some people thinking otherwise. social networks are awash with conspiracy theories. there have even been wannabe detectives coming to buildings like this, breaking into them and starting to search through them. police say they have thoroughly searched everywhere in a one mile radius and will take action against anyone found making offensive comments online. they have also issued what are called dispersal orders against anyone committing
i can guarantee you that. we would have found her, and she is not there in that section of the river up there. for her partner, it has been two weeks of hell. right now, it is as though she has vanished into thin air. like, yeah, just insane. police have consistently called this a missing persons inquiry. there is no evidence of a crime. our main working hypothesis, therefore, is that nicola has sadly fallen into the river, that there is no third party or criminal involvement, and that this is not suspicious, but a tragic case of a missing person. but that has not stopped some people thinking otherwise. social networks are awash with conspiracy theories. there have even been wannabe detectives coming to buildings like this, breaking into them and starting to search through them. police say they have