and i think i stole it from you because you are a word smith and would have used it anyway. what does this mean $3 million from netflix to gavin newsom what is it telling us? what it tells us is these are unlimited donations, pete, as far as netflix is concerned. and what we have here is, in other words, if it s a campaign, you can only donate so much. if it s something along the lines of this, which is a ballot initiative, then these tech giants can donate as much as they would like here in this effort. but it s no surprise this is coming from reed hastings, he is from netflix. netflix is the same company that actually green lighted a series called cuties. and, i mean, you have got see this poster. it s incredible. they sexualize young girls as young as 11 years old. this is what netflix is, right? and it just tells us what the swamp is as well, right, pete? where you have the powerful giving money to keep other people in power and its ultimate
request to define reasonable doubt. manafort s attorney is suggesting that longer deliberations actually favor his client. deliberating on monday, we re happy to see them doing so, and everyone, have a great weekend. does a longer deliberation work in your favor? think it does. avery freeman is civil rights attorney and law professor in cleveland. and richard herman, a criminal defense attorney, joining us from las vegas. it s been too long, gentlemen. it sure has. good to be back. i missed you. good to see you. all right, thanks so much. richard, you first, you know, in your experience what does it mean, if you want to, you know, read the tea leaves, longer deliberations usually favoring the defense? the defense attorney s a little cocky there with his comments like that. he went beyond that actually, fred. he thanked the president of the united states. this eloquent word smith decided to go out and say last week,
words and life. chef? yeah. the fluency with words. totally afwree. no matter what time of day, whatever situation, over drinks, sober, just the greatest like word smith. asked me like what is he like outside of the camera? he s just what he s like on the camera. and that s the beauty of him. he s unapologetically honest and a lot of people respect him for that. i respect him for that. it all gives us courage to be ourselves and be individuals that s what really radiates from him. what we get through tv, a sense of courage. james, he heaped high praise on you when your book came out. what do you think you learned most from him? the book was, i wanted to
again and again, that s when things get stinky. yes, it s a defense, it s not a good defense. i ve tried to look at both sides of the coin on this one. on the one side of the coin, i do think the president and his attorneys are going to be able to claim that during that meeting the president provided information. he wasn t at the trump tower meeting himself. he was provided information. he helped word smith a document or a narrative that was then put out and, hey, he was just n the other side of the coin, i d rather be the prosecutor on this one. because it does seem like a transparent attempt to put a false narrative into the stream of public consciousness. so i don t i don t think that argument s going to fly. i do think it s interesting we saw the defense team front this issue in its 20-page memo that was published over the weekend. what that says to me, stephanie,
trump ally roger stone. here s something he said about the president and turnover in the administration. donald trump cannot be managed, will not be managed. he is his own word smith, his own strategist, and he s good at it. there s got to be a high burnout rate of anyone who tries to get in the way of this man. he s like theodore roosevelt in that sense. he is impetuous. he is bombastic, and he loves america. and he has a vision of what he wants to do. back now with one of the directors of the documentary, get me roger stone, which is fascinating. also jim sciutto and carrie cordero. jim, i m reminded of every time we re talking about details that we or the washington post, the new york times, the wall street journal have learned about the mueller investigation, it is still just a small fraction, just the tip of the iceberg of what we actually know. they know so much more than we