only 23 republicans and 62 democrats voted no. why won t republicans vote for a bill to expand and store the full right to vote? i think if you look at the recent vote on it. it did get bipartisan vote including mine. it did? i sat next to a woman named cynthia mckinny to be in congress. i would not be here without the voters rights act. what the white democrats in the south were doing were putting enough african-american votes in congressional or political districts to make it so that republicans could not win and black could not win. to me there had been great advantages for both parties but for american in general because of voting rights. why oppose it?
russia has been effective in getting people to believe even they re willing to believe the real information that there is something about ukraine. it is that dangerous if people carry around this idea that we don t know what they did and ukraine did something wrong. yes, joy. thank you so much for having me. it helps russia for the republicans to help the kremlin muddy the waters and tried to blame ukraine when they clear lino from intelligence breakings and testimonies by accredited professionals that was russia and not ukraine that meddled into the elections. president trump s request for ukraine to investigate themselves for alleged election interference. pretend to think that ukrainer
going to read you a senate report, the senate committees are run by republicans. along into the connection of the association describing the nra as a foreign asset and underscores the nra in connection of activity and russia. do you believe that the nra should be looking into them, behaving as a russian asset. i would say any american entity seen as a russian asset by intelligence agency, we should review it. i would say that over conservative or liberal or organization and i think we should measure all of them with the same steps. that s good. let s talk about impeachment. i have my little binder.
reminded us that their e-mails got it, too. could it be compromised or purely economics or a combination of both? it could be a combination of both certainly. it sounds like republicans would not be too excited to have their e-mails released or very out spoken now and especially fox news that has become our version of the state immediate wmedia t saying russia is our ally that we should be supporting and not ukraine which is very alarming. i think it is a combination of both. it is power and money and russians know very well how to exploit both. you have tucker carlson telling them we should be on russia s side. thank you very much julia davis. donald trump s impeachment players are storming the sunday morning talk shows. we ll sort out all of that nonsense after this break. nonsense after this break. before we talk about tax-smart investing, what s new?
david holmes, political counselor at the u.s. embassy in ukraine explained it in his public testimony. second of all to drive a wedge between the united states and ukraine which russia wants to get back to influence. thirdly to smurge, support of ukraine and other key partners and elsewhere. nunes and company continues with these conspiracies. republicans growing affinity for russia is true. according to gallop, there is a wide disparity among those naming russia as a greatest enemy of the united states. democrats three times likely as republicans to name russians as the number one threat. as you can see in this chart after years of viewing russia