your were tepid, are you saying that vladimir putin was able to we were in singapore wants and he called him out in meddling in the election to his face, off camera. he has that capacity. but he is shrinking into his worst instincts. like he is somehow going to win the die hard maga. and he never will. at a time when the president was saying that he believed putin, that there was not any meddling in the election therein lies the challenge of working for donald trump. how did that go? a common thread. thing i would like to say again, mike pence, and i think we all mario agree on this table, he is a good american, i just wish we would ve seen a little bit more fire, a little more owning it and kind of coming down and saying, look, before the election, we lost let s just move forward. i wish i could see more anger. let s not single him out. many other republicans have not said anything as well. mike pence is obviously the
a scale that would have been affecting the outcome of the election. it is increasingly concerning that we were damaging, we were damaging his legacy. what did the president say about what you just described? he said something along the lines of, nobody will kill about my legacy if i lose. that won t matter. the only thing that matters is winning. no one will care about my legacy if i lose, the only thing that matters is winning. welcome back to our primetime recap of today s final public meeting from the january six investigation.
we have now is at least something that is a good, historical record in accounting of what happened that day. so we are not in the scenario being asked to believe are lying eyes. this was a bunch of people, riot that got out of hand. there were people who are armed, there were people there who had made tactical plans for what they were going to do. more importantly, it was part of this kind of multi prong effort that was going on in the justice department and on the state level and that was going on on social media, all of these things came together on that day. they didn t start on that day. i think that is one thing that the committee tried to really underscore. jamie, i have to say i am constantly stunned at how little the maga folks think in terms of how is this going to look to history. how, the whole idea of oh it is a democrat kangaroo court here, we know there are two republicans on it including quite conservative republicans in specially liz
hearing that we heard from the january six committee. this is the first time we saw her testimony, there was this pretty interesting discussions she revealed. i was becoming increasingly concerned that we were damaging his legacy. what did the president tell you in response to what you just described? he said something along the lines of, you know, nobody will care about my legacy if i lose. so, that won t matter. the only thing that matters is winning. at all costs. when anyway you can. through all the investigations, we ve learned that that was clearly how trump was approaching this election. i can t get over, and this is crazy, we don t hear a lot from
yesterday we saw the house select committee try to blunt that defense by presenting a lot of these previously unseen clips of white house advisers testifying that they, in fact, told him this was not true. let s take a listen to what hope hicks had to say. i was becoming increasingly concerned that we were damaging we were damaging his legacy. what did the president say in response to what you just described? he said something along the lines of, you know, nobody will care about my legacy if i lose, so that won t matter, the only thing that matters is is winning. not helpful for his defense if they re going to try to argue that he had a valid, honestly-held belief that he had won the election. now, lawmakers, they have made their case in the court of public opinion.