shot and killed a cinemaing to s togr apher. crew members are complained about safety issues on the film. we re learning of two incidents with guns that led up to the tragic shooting that occurred. matt finn in los angeles where this raised quite an issue and just outrage in the film making community in hollywood and elsewhere. reporter: the last word from the santa fe county sheriff s office is that this is an active investigation. witnesseses are cooperating. so far, no charges have been filed. now the family of the woman that he accidentally shot and killed is speaking out, posting a picture to instagram, question writing we miss you. they said she had a marriage that was an example to follow
witness and we have i believe eight witnesseses testifying over three days next week. so you know the president s going to be watching, he s watched so far in this process and i don t blame him. this process affects him in a very real way. he could face articles of impeachment which is something that obviously something very serious. he knows what would happen p if it goes to the senate and essentially it s pretty clear that republicans would fall in line. there s a lot of unity that exists in the republican party. that being said, no one wants it as their legacy that they were an impeached president. eric: likely, you think thrill with be more tweets coming? it s a big week, sondland is testifying, reportedly said he overheard a conversation that someone had while in kiev with the president and hearing the president talk directly about wanting the investigation. this seemingly the first testimony that could directly tie the president to the request to have an investigation of the
high crime could be they could impeach the president for having bad hair. so this is a political thing. him going out and tweeting this, trying to get his base to support, i think it s too far a stretch for the democrats to say this is witness intimidation. what they should say is why is he attacking this woman, this career diplomat, this career public servant. shows you he s scared. instead of calling it witness intimidation, address it for what it is. it s a response that comes out of fear. let the congressman deal with the issue. if he wanted to confront this particular witness or any of the witnesseses in the process, let the congressmen come in, come forward, and cross-examine these individuals. they re there to render testimony. there s no issue with that. they could have brought that up during that hearing. eric: speaking of the members of congress, mark meadows talking about this issue. i don t know that it was an attack on the witness. it was really a characterization of
bidens. this is the testimony that i m most interested as well as a lot of other legal people are most interested in watching on wednesday morning, this is the testimony of gordon sondland, the u.s. ambassador to the european union. unlike the witnesses we ve seen so far, eric, he is not a trained diplomat. he s an individual who donated $1 million to the president s inaugural committee and got this plumb post of u.s. ambassador to the european union. i think his testimony will be unlike the testimony that we ve heard so far, from the three witnesseses that we ve heard so far, which was very measured, very diplomatic. he s not trained that way and i think that for that reason it will be interesting to hear how he handles tough questions coming from both republicans and democrats that sit on the intelligence committee. eric: finally, john, let s say the democrats ask him about that phone call specifically, did you talk to the president, did he direct you to yes, that the
security secrets and information from getting in the the handle of thecu russian, the chinese, d other adversaries and instead they re using a skiff in a bad way to hide from the american people an investigation that would trash if successful vote of over 60 million americans and undermine our republican in the process. isn t this the pointing, really they re in that skiff to keep we the people in the in the dark. that s it. that s the only reason. not even just republicans in the press. they want to keep we the people in the dark. so they can keep pushing their propaganda and propaganda american people are smart, and these ukrainian issue is pseudo issue it is a fake issue one pseudo issue after another, and they bring in a line of witnesseses to keep pushing this matter, narrative, narrative, butri the the president really d trump them didn t he? by releasing the phone call