fact was so fundamentally and existentially wrong with what the trump campaign did. and i just want to say one more thing. this is a challenge not just for democrats and republicans and impeachment. this is also a challenge for us in the media analysts, reporters whatever else. how will we interpret, use, analyze information known to be given to a campaign by a foreign entity, stolen in wikileaks sharz on other cases. let me put it this which. it s not norway. it s not norway it s russia or china. it s time for us to think about how will we use the information, report and analyze that information, because we can t we can t validate it or give it approval. so, mark, what do you make of the fact that he answered the questions in this way in obviously this is what he really thinks. he is being casual and answering it. but, he know what is he is saying. all right. he means what he says and says what he means. we ll talk about that later in the show.
let me talk with you about this. master burns, what do you make of this? trump over there blasting biden? making a fool of abe by saying he has nothing to fear from weapons that could have reached him from north korea. whatever else. backing kim jong un against the un security council. i can t remember any american president saying anything quite like this where you side with one of the worst human rights violators in the world. a tyrant with the former vice president. most americans, almost all american s would say it s outrageous for the president to comport himself on this and any conversation. secondly on the big issue of north korea s nuclear weapon, he said he was not disturbed by the small weapons. they are contravened by the
investigation further and she got some good information which she can now take and say, this is the basis for why we should take further allegations whether it s the bank fraud allegations, possibly fraudulent bank statements, tax returns, whatever else. she did a really nice job. whoever prepped her did a fantastic job. good to see you, joe, thank you very much on all of that. let s talk about the democrat who oversaw cohen s hearing. if cohen mentioned your name, expect to hear from his committee one way or another. and some of the names that cohen mentioned, names from trump s inner circle, we have not heard before. chris cillizza is with me and chris, michael cohen may have been the star of the hearing, so to speak, but there were many names he brought up. so who did he talk about? yeah. it s fascinating. just when you thought you knew all the players in this massive game, now there s more. let s go through. some we heard before. some we hadn t.
of that nature. no, nor did they have the abundant amount of information, documents, testimonies, other types of things that the special counsel would have so that they can, in fact, try to pulse these things off of the various people who they were interviewing. so the special counsel s team, i m sure, has so much more information that they ve been able to leverage in order to get to the truth. that s why i think everybody should take a step back and breathe and not make any conclusions about whether or not there was criminal conspiracy. whether or not there was, in fact, active efforts on the part of u.s. persons to conspire with the russians in order to try to influence the outcome of the election. that s whatmueller s team is going to do and accept whatever robert mueller has come out. you re confident that he s had access to all the things that could fill in that picture
and so i think the team is very cognizant of this debate right now in terms of it s going to go to the attorney general. presumably, william barr if he s confirmed. and i would like to think they re going to write it in a way that the report, itself, will be written in a way that can be released fully then there would be an annex that would have privacy information, executive privilege information, classified information, whatever else, that could be supplemental to the report. but i think that they will do a great service to the american people and to the attorney general if they deliver this report, whatever it is, in a manner that will allow him to almost without any redaction release it publicly. i want to ask you about the president s break with the intel community because i haven t seen, you know, since that happened. it was so startling broke with the intel community a long time but i ve seen you since then. the latest one. the latest one. okay. 7.0. not to b