that senator lindsey graham and chuck grassley think this is a real gotcha. it strikes us as odd, this is such an unusual e-mail yeah. what wouldn t be odd? you re the national security adviser and your incoming replacement is mike flynn, who you know is the subject of an fbi investigation, because of his ties to russia. remember, obama fired mike flynn. when trump came to the white house to meet obama after the election, president obama reportedly warned president-elect trump about two things. one, north korea. two, mike flynn. and trump decided to keep mike flynn anyway. if you re in charge of the transition, the part of the transition, the national security adviser part of the transition, from yourself to mike flynn, do you hand him all the intel you ve got? do you read him in on everything? we ve got a spy working in putin s office, would you tell mike flynn the name of that person? might you memorialize in a note
measure that will keep the government running for a few more weeks. the senate is now expected to endorse the measure which would avert a partial government shutdown. we re talking with congressman eric swalwell. stand by for a moment, congressman, i quickly want to go to our congressional correspondent to bring us up to date. what s the latest? congress, wolf, is one step closer to avoiding a government shutdown. the house just in the last few moments passed a stopgap measure that will fund the government until the middle of january. that passed in the house by a vote of 231 to 188. now leading up to this, there had been considerable competing priorities among house republicans, a lot of battling back and forth on what would be included, what wouldn t be included. in the end, this is a very scaled down version. this would keep the government funded only until january 19th, it includes a short term reauthorization of the visa government, the government surveillance program that s set
whether there was corrupt intent. they ll do that. you had an obama prosecutor on here who explained what she thought would be in play and what wouldn t. that s going to happen in this whole investigation. here is the thing. i guess we re all in the business where we say to the american people what s happening along the way. it will all come out. i guess my objection to what you are saying is that no one in the white house has asked the washington post to correct their story. that s my understanding, phillip rutger, is that the case as of this hour? that s correct. i can tell you guys that our findings in the story and specifically the phrase that the president dictated this statement is based on our reporting with a number of advisers, a number of sources from a number of different walks of life as it relates to this story. so we re very confident in our reporting. let me add to phillip s reporting. you can disagree the facts represent a troubling development from the white
at times. there were days, at the time, where they would debate over what evidence would be allowed, what wouldn t be allowed. we would have to wait days between things. that s key. some of the stuff that wasn t included is the stuff that showed the dude might be guilty. exactly. the jury is taken out of the room for evidence hearing. and when the media has to watch hours of this testimony, will this be allowed, not allowed, it makes you wonder, why are they working so hard to get rid of this or that the? he actually greeted the victim in a bath towel. he had her come there. he creeped this girl out. he was calling her. they found nonblood dna on the hatch of her car after she was killed. but the difference here, all of these things were left out of the documentary. they were left out of the documentary. this is where it s interesting to me. i call myself a futon detective. this is somebody who watches this and thinks he knows the case. i watched the entire show, over
at times. there were days, at the time, where they would debate over what evidence would be allowed, what wouldn t be allowed. we would have to wait days between things. that s key. some of the stuff that wasn t included is the stuff that showed the dude might be guilty. exactly. the jury is taken out of the room for evidence hearing. and when the media has to watch hours of this testimony, will this be allowed, not allowed, it makes you wonder, why are they working so hard to get rid of this or that the? he actually greeted the victim in a bath towel. he had her come there. he creeped this girl out. he was calling her. they found nonblood dna on the hatch of her car after she was killed. but the difference here, all of these things were left out of the documentary. they were left out of the documentary. this is where it s interesting to me. i call myself a futon detective. this is somebody who watches this and thinks he knows the case. i watched the entire show, over 24 hour