judge jeanine: if you want to criticize him for not going to law school, i will criticize you for not putting your evidence where your allegations are. he just made the case for us. he claims to be a lawyer and he just made the case that donald trump didn t collude on national television on the most of popular show. thanks, chris. you are telling us you read the indictment and donald trump collude with the russians. now it s time to call you out. donald trump excluded with the russians yet in the indictment it says they mad to ask someone to ask someone to ask someone to speculate on what wikileaks was going release next after they already released the trump data? does that make any sense? dan, donald trump s own secretary of state when he was director of the cia called
judge jeanine: if you want to criticize him for not going to law school, i will criticize you for not putting your evidence where your allegations are. he just made the case for us. he claims to be a lawyer and he just made the case that donald trump didn t collude on national television on the most of popular show. thanks, chris. you are telling us you read the indictment and donald trump collude with the russians. now it s time to call you out. donald trump excluded with the russians yet in the indictment it says they mad to ask someone to ask someone to ask someone to speculate on what wikileaks was going release next after they already released the trump data? does that make any sense? dan, donald trump s own secretary of state when he was director of the cia called
judge jeanine: if you want to criticize him for not going to law school, i will criticize you for not putting your evidence where your allegations are. he just made the case for us. he claims to be a lawyer and he just made the case that donald trump didn t collude on national television on the most of popular show. thanks, chris. you are telling us you read the indictment and donald trump collude with the russians. now it s time to call you out. donald trump excluded with the russians yet in the indictment it says they mad to ask someone to ask someone to ask someone to speculate on what wikileaks was going release next after they already released the trump data? does that make any sense? dan, donald trump s own secretary of state when he was director of the cia called
that someone on his team was doing something that helped russia. someone on his team is accused of helping russia launder information through an organization to attack the democracy. from russia s perspective, this is great. we have the president of the united states again not criticizing russia s attack on our country because it involves roger stone and the campaign. in all fairness, he is not charged with conspiracy or collusion, these charges relate to deciphering what wikileaks was doing. on that note, let s listen to the president. this is the president in october of 2016 on the campaign trail. this just came out. wikileaks. i love wikileaks. this wikileaks stuff is unbelievable. it tells you the inner heart. you got to read it. it is amazing what s coming out on wikileaks. another one came in today. this wikileaks is like a treasure trove. they were just announcing new wikileaks and i wanted to stay there but didn t want to keep
what it going to say,ng no good prosecutor builds a case this way. you don t build a case by pleading your cooperating witnesses to lying to the f.b.i. sean: what about the you want to put a witness on the stand and the thing the jury remembers about them is that they are a liar? sean: it sounds like bribery to me. see what we want. this is what corsi was saying. he knew what they wanted him to say. he could have saved himself andus what do you want me to say? i ll say it. this is unscrupulous tactics sean: i got a different question. 6-3, pentagon papers, stolen information. it was upheld by the supreme court. 6-3 decision. stolen information. now if wikileaks didn t steal it and it was given to them, and the new york times published what wikileaks published, they are not based on the pentagon paper decision,