And crucially he knows he is not supposed to do what hes doing, not supposed to get involved, admitting at much in a Radio Interview yesterday. You know, the saddest thing is that because im the president of the United States, i am not supposed to be involved with the Justice Department. Im not supposed to be involved with the fbi. Im not supposed to be doing the kind of things that i would love to be doing. And i am very frustrated by it. I look at whats happening with the Justice Department. Why arent they going after Hillary Clinton with her emails and with her the dossier. If we havent yet heard widespread calls for impeachment, its because this president s disregard for the rule of law for democratic norms, his authoritarian impulses are largely baked in in the countrys perception, even among political insiders. It was just a couple of days ago, for example, that he called the american criminal Justice System a joke and a laughing stock. On top of that, all indications are that th
enforcement opens an investigation or prosecutes someone, it s based on the evidence and not on political ideology. and that s what make the president s comments so dangerous. he believes it s okay to use the incredible coerce i ve power of the federal government to go after political enemies. it s wrong and it s also, by the way, obstruction of justice. the argument on the other side are these are the whalings of a fundamentally impotent individual. that were he actually directly ordering the department of justice to do this, that would be one thing, but he s just kind of whining about it on twitter the way that anyone watching fox news might. and, therefore, it s less of a threat and doesn t cross the line. what do you make of that argument? i suppose if this was donald trump, the real estate developer, doing things on twitter, it would be different. but he s the president of the united states. and if he in fact is under investigation, we don t know if he is, but if he is, then h
evidence and not on political ideology. and that s what make the president s comments so dangerous. he believes it s okay to use the incredible coerce i ve power of the federal government to go after political enemies. it s wrong and it s also, by the way, obstruction of justice. the argument on the other side are these are the whalings of a fundamentally impotent individual. that were he actually directly ordering the department of justice to do this, that would be one thing, but he s just kind of whining about it on twitter the way that anyone watching fox news might. and, therefore, it s less of a threat and doesn t cross the line. what do you make of that argument? i suppose if this was donald trump, the real estate developer, doing things on twitter, it would be different. but he s the president of the united states. and if he in fact is under investigation, we don t know if he is, but if he is, then he has now either endeavored to influence or directly tried to influence the
not up to speed yet. and we can t predict the exact height of the wave when it makes landfall. and handcuff how, on a typical stormy day, you have waves that would dwarf the tsunami, and here we see the surfers with the super waves, probably 10 times of what the tsunami was today. some would say, whalings all the fuss about? i have seen bigger waves before. i saw surfers out there today. we have to be on guard, look what happened with the tsunami of 2004. the wave was not that high, but it kept going, and it wiped out entire cities and areas, and so we have to be on alert for these things. everyone argues about and debates climate change, and whether or not it s real. or if it s just a creation of
and we can t predict the exact height of the wave when it makes landfall. and handcuff how, on a typical stormy day, you have waves that would dwarf the tsunami, and here we see the surfers with the super waves, probably 10 times of what the tsunami was today. some would say, whalings all the fuss about? i have seen bigger waves before. i saw surfers out there today. we have to be on guard, look what happened with the tsunami of 2004. the wave was not that high, but it kept going, and it wiped out entire cities and areas, and so we have to be on alert for these things. everyone argues about and debates climate change, and whether or not it s real. or if it s just a creation of