Its interesting how that came about. How do we fix these issues . I do think its possible to manage confrontation. Penn states hr 70 policy for dismissal of a faculty member talks about how the testimony can be obtained and gives the Panel Control over saying this is revictimizing or we need to do something. Its just not specific. I think requiring clear and convincing evidence to protect against procedural irregularities which is often the argument, well, we need this, if we dont have this, were going to have procedural irregularities. Why dont we fix the irregularities then. Instead of having a standard that is criminalizing, i think thats the important point, confrontation and the hearing i think in dismissal or suspension and the cases for students was pretty clear that that initial case was for suspension and they said if you need more, there might be more required. Use of technology, questions of the panel, interrogatories for people who choose not to attend, using the investigat
Its interesting how that came about. How do we fix these issues . I do think its possible to manage confrontation. Penn states hr 70 policy for dismissal of a faculty member talks about how the testimony can be obtained and gives the Panel Control over saying this is revictimizing or we need to do something. Its just not specific. I think requiring clear and convincing evidence to protect against procedural irregularities which is often the argument, well, we need this, if we dont have this, were going to have procedural irregularities. Why dont we fix the irregularities then. Instead of having a standard that is criminalizing, i think thats the important point, confrontation and the hearing i think in dismissal or suspension and the cases for students was pretty clear that that initial case was for suspension and they said if you need more, there might be more required. Use of technology, questions of the panel, interrogatories for people who choose not to attend, using the investigat
Its interesting how that came about. How do we fix these issues . I do think its possible to manage confrontation. Penn states hr 70 policy for dismissal of a faculty member talks about how the testimony can be obtained and gives the Panel Control over saying this is revictimizing or we need to do something. Its just not specific. I think requiring clear and convincing evidence to protect against procedural irregularities which is often the argument, well, we need this, if we dont have this, were going to have procedural irregularities. Why dont we fix the irregularities then. Instead of having a standard that is criminalizing, i think thats the important point, confrontation and the hearing i think in dismissal or suspension and the cases for students was pretty clear that that initial case was for suspension and they said if you need more, there might be more required. Use of technology, questions of the panel, interrogatories for people who choose not to attend, using the investigat
Its interesting how that came about. How do we fix these issues . I do think its possible to manage confrontation. Penn states hr 70 policy for dismissal of a faculty member talks about how the testimony can be obtained and gives the Panel Control over saying this is revictimizing or we need to do something. Its just not specific. I think requiring clear and convincing evidence to protect against procedural irregularities which is often the argument, well, we need this, if we dont have this, were going to have procedural irregularities. Why dont we fix the irregularities then. Instead of having a standard that is criminalizing, i think thats the important point, confrontation and the hearing i think in dismissal or suspension and the cases for students was pretty clear that that initial case was for suspension and they said if you need more, there might be more required. Use of technology, questions of the panel, interrogatories for people who choose not to attend, using the investigat
Its interesting how that came about. How do we fix these issues . I do think its possible to manage confrontation. Penn states hr 70 policy for dismissal of a faculty member talks about how the testimony can be obtained and gives the Panel Control over saying this is revictimizing or we need to do something. Its just not specific. I think requiring clear and convincing evidence to protect against procedural irregularities which is often the argument, well, we need this, if we dont have this, were going to have procedural irregularities. Why dont we fix the irregularities then. Instead of having a standard that is criminalizing, i think thats the important point, confrontation and the hearing i think in dismissal or suspension and the cases for students was pretty clear that that initial case was for suspension and they said if you need more, there might be more required. Use of technology, questions of the panel, interrogatories for people who choose not to attend, using the investigat