Earlier years. Is china more nationalistic in its economic practices, but jiggly those among the enterprises . Has china become more assertive internationally . I would argue east of these questions carried fairly profound rule of law implications. As xi jinping rises to take the top position in china and wrestles with new challenges and attempts to answer any questions, i would argue that many of them are based in basic rule of law doctorate doctrine. The most important steps ahead for china will be around bolstering the rule of law. The implications are profound for expanding civil society, for human rights, for addressing the needs of ordinary citizens, for building a greater economic certainty. Rule of law is an essential pillar of our democracy. For china, rule of law is the best way of regulating and settling disputes in society. Serving as a check against the abuse of power. The real question for china over the next few years will be, what Reigns Supreme for the worlds second la
A question. Actually two questions. One, the portability aspect of new slegs legislation, how much does it conflict with state level Health Insurance and state level mandates that differ, of course, widely . How do you reconcile the provision that we have Health Coverage, all of it has a 10th amendment contest really. We stipulate that anybody that has a nexus for their Health Coverage with the federal government, then thats where it applies. So for example if our individual membership associations which would have a nexus with the federal government because it allows paur cross state lines, they would be able to own that. Individuals who are in any erisa plan, they would be able to own that. So it gets to that by making certain that everybody has a nexus with the federal overnment. One more quick question. I think weve seen how much patients and prospective patients are resistant to the law. Looking at the damages, pharmaceuticals, hospitals, clinics, how much pushback is Congress Hea
Russia is condemning an israeli air strike on syrian territory calls link calling it a brazen attack on international law. What is unclear is what israel was targeting. Israeli warplanes attacked a convoy of trucks traveling across the border of lebanon. Nicole johnson is live in jerusalem. The reaction is coming in from this incident. That is right. We have had a response from hezbollah. It has condemned the attack inside syria, saying it is a dangerous act. We also heard from russia, which said it will be taking urgent action to clarify what has happened. There is still a great deal of uncertainty. The u. S. Navy is reports in israeli officials spoke to u. S. A Administration Officials and informs them they are planning and carrying out an attack on an arms shipments said to be carrying russian missiles destined for hezbollah. If those missiles were surface toair missiles, that would be a game changer. It would make it difficult to carry out air operations in northern israel as well
One Nuclear Device to me is clearly a redline. Brown former Vice President al gore joins us to talk about his new book as well as Money Politics and the future of democracy. The congress is virtually incapable of passing any reforms unless they first get permission from the powerful special interests. Woodruff do Americans Trust the federal government . Andrew kohut says a new pew poll shows the majority do not. Brown and ray suarez gets the latest on the chinese hackers who allegedly mounted a fourmonth cyberattack against the New York Times. Thats all ahead on tonights newshour. Major funding for the pbs newshour has been provided by moving our economy for 160 years. Bnsf, the engine that connects us. And by the alfred p. Sloan foundation. Supporting science, technology, and improved Economic Performance and Financial Literacy in the 21st century. And with the ongoing support of these institutions and foundations. And. This program was made possible by the corporation for public broa
N espn on cspan radio. And support building. The military action in congress on the next 45 minutes your comments on the congressional reaction to the president s proposal for syria. If you support it or are against it. Mocrat democrat for 202 5853880 for democrats. 202 5853881 for republicans. D you can also contact us on twitter, facebook or email us. Theres a headline from the wall street journal in which we take our questions. The journals headlines support builds in congress for the strike in syria. It egoes to the senate side inside. And talking about the draft amendment that will be debated today in the senate and then the New York Times turns to the house. Tweeters express support how leaders express support for syria strike. Again, for our first 45 minutes, your reaction to how senators and legislatures are reacting and comments they have made, hearings that will take place. If you want to give us a call its 202 5853880 for democrats. 202 5853881 for republicans. And 202 62802