on censorship that the democrats tried to censor and don t forget on tuesday of next week we hav e our town hall r with rfk. it s in new york city and ticketfk andity and s free e on hannity .com. all right but first we begin tonight. it is now very, very clear that a malignant cancer is within and surrounding joe biden s. it is growing. it is growing dailiy. it is compounding, to quote john dean, it now is also clear that joe biden may be the most corruptt president in hiso american history, certainly in the modern eraryrtainly . investigations are heating up. the walls are absolutely closing in. this is very real. house republicans are now seeking answers on the white house s ever changing about joe biden s involvement, which he denied repeatedly duringcampi the campaign with hunter biden s foreign business dealingsgn, noting that there he
he already seniod $5 million tow thase bidens in 2015. he was the head of harvestnter investment firm and what s interesting is that in the correspondence there, huntern biden again talks to zhao in the context of this is a deal that s important to my family involving his father. let s also keep in mind we fixate on the criminal elementh, of this. we also have to focus on the espionage element of this. henry zhao paid $5 million to hunter biden from an account part of a company that he co-owned with the family of the minister of state security of china who s in charge of the entire spy apparatus and see that in every deal that hunterri biden did in china, these individuals that are sending hie money have ties to chinese intelligence. maria: unbelievable. we hav e to take a quick break and talk more about that and the 17 recordings that the executive have. stay with us right there, stay with us.
painted as violent extremists, as they stood up forto poi their children. what is it about? and i want t to poinhaoct ouumer document allegedly created during the trump years by ae to contractor thibiggers speaks too to a bigger problem. and it is thu wae deepnt state u is to your point, you wantl se to clean up some of those civilh thrvants that exist in the trump administration and the biden administration and threw out severaalons. l administrations. dhristio you think that san s going on here with the targeting of christiant iss? that s absolutely what s going on . po have a corrupa corrupt administrative police state that has become so politicized you cannot reforu t. m that caylee. . and this is where i differ fromn president trump or build on what he did. we hav e to go further and shut it down, starting with the fbi,a which i ve said i would shute so down these agencies that should not have existed or have become so corruptcorrupt, canno. you cannot reform themdown top down
committee. he joins me noe ins mew. welcome , chairman. you know, i asked jim jordanougs this yesterday, and i want your thoughts on it to a formerh doj official told me thatrecord the question doj should answer i on the record a no excuse, not to , is whether they are d handling that document, thatocum e document that would, show biden giving a favor in exchange for cash , that dojl an has political appointees. are they handling ittees are or> in the realm of special counsel? dhao you haveve any updatee on that? we hav e done we re completely wor in the dark. senator grassley, who s workwitt the doj and the fbi for decades, is completely in the dark. t we know that this document exists. . an the fbi knows we know ans whether document exists. and instead of answering that simple question as to whether, or not they have investigated this allegation and what their findings were, they simply explain to us what the document was. and we re very patronizinging as as t didn o why we didn
come over the transom. so you often havft have to make a sort of gut check on how much credibility and wait to give something on that scale. ththe types of of stories i give the most weight to are the ones from whistleblowers directlythat to congress. the reason is that thos those individuals who know that they can be criminally charged for lying to investigators. so this isn t just something coming over the transom to the washington post.e an it s not some anonymous source p that a reporteorr citing. it is someone who has met with investigators in areo take subject to that penalty. so you have to take it seriously. and there is this sharp disconnect. when we had a whistleblower in the first trump impeachment, the media really went,th you know, full board to this this story. they re showing a lotht more skepticism here. but we hav e to just learn the details. , thisone of the reasons, kellyanne, that this is so o serious is because of what we be know already.