actual report, the watergate road map. that prosecutors sent to congress 50 years ago by the watergate special prosecutor after he declined to indict president richard nixon. instead of indicting him, he shared that sealed report. that laid out all of the evidence, the documents the grand jury had collected. that is called the watergate road map. that is ultimately what this city has to decide if they want to follow in that vein and present the report without explicit comment to the department of justice or if they want to make a big public statement and say these are the crimes we think the former president committed or his co-conspirators and really make a bigger show of it. but as for today, the public reason that we heard from zoe lofgren very seemed like she had rehearsed that one this morning, was they had video issues, they
department famously told the court that all the grand jury material that had been collected by watergate special prosecutors, right, all of the evidence that they had got from witnesses, talking to the grand jury about the president s behavior, about the whole watergate scandal all of that grand jury material collected by archibald cox and leon jaworski, the watergate special prosecutors justices agreed that that material collected in the investigation needs to go to congress, because congress needs to decide if this is a basis for impeaching president nixon. and in fact, that grand jury material was packaged up into what s now been called the watergate roadmap, and that watergate roadmap of grand jury material is what the judiciary committee used to draw up the impeachment articles against richard nixon, which ultimately led to his resignation. so, that s the relevant, most-recent precedent here. clear as day. when it came to this special counsel investigation, though, the bob mue
what the so-called watergate road map was to president richard nixon. tucker: i am not a fact witness dean conceded. what other kinds of witnesses are there? editorial witnesses? people who have no idea what they are talking about but feel very strongly about it? the entire hearing went like this and dean wasn t the only cable news analyst there democrats invited a lot of them. they detroited out a fake expert for example called barbara mcquade. mcquade is an msnbc legal analyst once a u.s. attorney before donald trump fired her. since then she has been on call to reassure jittery msnbc viewers that the 2016 election wasn t actually real. and in any cases big orange will be gone very soon. the conduct diswribsd in the report constitutes multiple crimes of obstruction of justice. it s supported by evidence of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and i m confident that
is to president trump what the so-called watergate road map was to president richard nixon. tucker: i am not a fact witness, dean conceded. what other kinds of witnesses are there? editorial witnesses? people who have no idea what they re talking about but feel very strongly about it? [laughs] the entire hearing went like this and dean wasn t even the only cable news analyst there. democrats invited a lot of them. they trotted out a fake expert, for example, called barbara mcquade. an msnbc legal analyst who was once u.s. attorney before donald trump fired her. since then, she has been on call to reassure jittery msnbc viewers the 2016 election wasn t actually real and in any case, big orange will be gone veryon soon. the conduct described in the report constitutes multiple crimes of obstruction of justice. if it is supported by evidence of guilt beyond a reasonable