who would want to be part of it this when every day new allegations that supposedly were around for many years, when these allegations could have come out when it started at the very beginning. why wasn t this brought forward? these are such serious allegations, one has to question why? in his opening statement, his statement that he s going to deliver tomorrow before the senate judiciary committee, assuming this hearing goes forward, he says this. i spent most of my time in high school focused on academics, sports, church and service. but i was not perfect in those days, just as i am not perfect today. i drank beer with my friends, sometimes on weekends, sometimes i had too many. in retrospect i said and did things in high school that make me cringe now. you ve discussed this with him, what makes you cringe now? i think we all have those kinds of things that we say when we re 16, 17, 18 years old that
impartiality. it seems like a lose-lose for the republicans. the president has shown restraint on the subject. last night at the rally, with the crowd hearing behind him, he said why wasn t this reported to the fbi 36 years ago. i don t know. there could be risk for him there. somebody around him has gotten to him and told him to be restrained on this until last night. you have to be fair. the timing of all this is fishy. dianne feinstein sitting on it. it happened 36 years ago. this does raise issues with the timing. let s talk about the economy. we were led to believe the trade war with the united states and china could be devastating for our economy. not so much. the s&p 500 and dow both at record highs. what s happening here, greg? it is funny, dave. you get china retaliating. the market goes up.
or lack thereof and the maine senator also says she favors hearing from both of these folks. that could delay things. the read on how much of a delay we could be looking at with attorney emily compagno. there were at least half a dozen different investigations and stages to go through where none of this came to light what are we to make of that. neil, that s part of the argument exactly. since 1993 judge kavanaugh has undergone extensive scrutiny by the fbi not only as to his background in terms of his fitness for judicial seats but also for clearance. he held a top secret clearance almost at the level of the president when he worked with then president bush. the argument exactly is well why wasn t this uncovered before in this level of investigation and level of background checks he went 25 years. neil: 51 never brought to
uber and lift has been fired after using a web cam to live stream his rides. he broadcasted passengers names, addresses, private, and intimate conversations. he told the paper he was just capturing the natural interactions between himself and the passengers. he says the cameras were there for his own safety. wasn t this isn t this some sort of cable show? isn t there a tax talk show you know taxi cab confessions, one of your favorite shows. yes, but i forgot the name of it. i don t know, this is live streaming, this doesn t seem very friendly. no, not a good policy.
that was part of an fbi investigation. and again, we re talking about another meeting we hadn t learned about but robert mueller uncovered. why wasn t this previously disclosed? yeah, well, roger stone and michael caputo both say that this meeting was very brief, it was kind of a glancing thing that happened and they just simply forgot all about it. they didn t give it any further thought. mr. caputo says that he no longer had access to these text messages and so he was you know, his memory was refreshed when they were shown to him during his interview with robert mueller s team in early may. you know, i ve seen a lot of questioning. i think i just saw some new reporting from cnn actually from congressman schiff from the intelligence committee casting doubt, saying he does not believe that those claims are credible. now, if the president was unaware that numerous people on his campaign were meeting with russians, is it fair to question