also that kind of ruling. the washington post tonight, for example, calls tonight s ruling against trump a, quote, resounding rejection of trump s case. the post describing the ruling as quote, blunt and at times blistering language. they re not wrong about that. let me just share with you a little bit of what this ruling actually sounds like, tonight. , quote, shortly before noon ungenerous ex president donald trump took a stage at the rally of supporters on the, just south of the white house. during his more than one hour-long speech trump reiterated his claim that the election was rigged and swung. he then urged vice president pledge would observe over the certification to do the right thing by rejecting various states electoral votes, and refusing to certify the election in favor of mr. biden. towards the end of the speech president trump, and also support is that, quote, we are in walk down pennsylvania and we re going to try and give all republicans the kind of pride and wellne
phone number, a seventh phone number for him. but we had no look at that number either. it went straight to voicemails. so we left a voice, man we texted him there as well. i m beginning to think we are not going to hear back from john eastman for comment. fingers crossed. also i will never ever, report anything as apparent good news, ever again. i m sure i m the one who s just jinxed all of it. that said, i should tell you that just within the last hour, the washington post has just reported, that the same trump lawyer, john eastman, is expected to be subpoenaed by the january six committee and, congress which is of course investigating the attack on the capitol in the lead up to it. the chairman of that committee, congressman benny thompson of mississippi, told the washington post tonight, quote, it will happen, a scene pena. meaning the trump lawyer john eastman who did plot out a way to overturn the 2020 election for donald trump, who apparently as of this weekend was still saying
the public, i don t see why this would only be about one phone call. based on the reports out of the washington post tonight, seems there were multiple points in which this case was building over time for the whistleblower complaint and maybe the phone call was the last straw or maybe the first straw that started to put this puzzle together. so when we get to the point where we are starting to talk about the complaint and the actual whistleblower i think is when we get more to the bottom of what this all is about. two things have dramatically changed. the house speaker coming out in favor of an impeachment inquiry, all sorts of other democratic members who previously have been quiet on the subject coming out and calling for the same thing. the other thing that s changed is the white house just this afternoon and this evening saying the president saying on twitter here comes the
washington post tonight, seems there were multiple points in which this case was building over time for the whistleblower complaint and maybe the phone call was the last straw or maybe the first straw that started to put this puzzle together. so when we get to the point where we are starting to talk about the complaint and the actual whistleblower i think is when we get more to the bottom of what this all is about. two things have dramatically changed. the house speaker coming out in favor of an impeachment inquiry, all sorts of other democratic members who previously have been quiet on the subject coming out and calling for the same thing. the other thing that s changed is the white house just this afternoon and this evening saying the president saying on twitter here comes the transcript and my phone conversation and apparently this whistleblower complaint. what is behind that change on the white house s part in terms of potentially releasing these things? it s a dramatic shift i
school student turns out he was taunted by a group called the black 1r5er89s. israelites. he was vilified in the media for allegedly taunting a native american man you can see right there. the washington post reported extensively on this. sandman s attorney announced they would actually sue the post for defamation for $250 million. but as you say the washington post, they have issued this editor s note. they say, quote: subsequent reporting, a student statement and additional video allow for a more complete assessment of what occurred either contradicting or failing to confirm accounts provided in that story. now, we do know that the the washington post says including that native american activist nathan phillips was prevented by one student from moving on and that his group has been taunted by the students in the lead-up to the encounter and that the students were trying to investigate a conflict. now, that is coming from the washington post tonight. a rare editor s note from t