that s not how it works. if congress wanted to turn samalea chambers into a transgender health clinic, we would have full constitutional authority to do so. i think that deep down, he knows that, and he s scared of it. that is why he wants to go out and tell the american people the opposite. that is a vision for the supreme court s future there, martin. alito did this hours long interview, as we have mentioned with david b. rifkin. he appears before the court, he will be appearing on the federal income tax case. he is also an attorney for conservative activists leonard leo, he reportedly facilitated alito s grand alaskan adventure. i am trying to think of how wildly agree just this is. if ketanji brown jackson sat down for a new york times interview with the democrat election lawyer to talk about the l.a. galatea of republican voter laws, what would conservatives say? and let s just add an extra layer to this. david rifkin also wrote a
trying to say there, and maybe such an important point, most of the country s history, congress regulated the supreme court. it added or subtracted seats. taking away the power it moved certain hearings for totally partisan purposes. i m not saying that is all good, but it does show that embedded in the constitution is this idea of checks and balances among all three branches of the branches. the supreme court he seems to think sits a top the government, and also the balances to two other branches. that s not how it works. if congress wanted to turn samalea chambers into a transgender health clinic, we would have full constitutional authority to do so. i think that deep down, he knows that, and he s scared of it. that is why he wants to go out and tell the american people the opposite. that is a vision for the supreme court s future there, martin. alito did this hours long interview, as we have mentioned with david b. rifkin. he appears before the court, he will be appearing on the
Democrats attempted to sound an alarm during a Legislative Building news conference about the proposal that Senate Republicans unveiled last week and that could be debated this week.
calling him ron sanctimoniou now is calling him tiny d. which it hurts me, but that so good. it s so, so good and he s gonna demolish rhonda sanchez, yes, i think the hell column you pointed out hits to it more on trump s grievances are personal and that what seems to resonat with his supporters. we should probably emphasize that that s not even close to majority in the country. molly was talking about th republican nominating someon who s electable, electable throughout the entire countr is an important thing to think about. that s not actually what republicans are thinking about it s important, around desanti is troubling and not yet quite trump like on this ver specific level which is in my column, it s big deal of having - in his first race for governor and he beats chris by 20 point this time it take a look at some of the voter laws some of the voter voter registration regulations
state legislature theory. and this started back in hi home state of north carolina. when the republican of-led legislature tried to redraw and redistrict maps before the 2022 election. they shade they should not have intervened. what they are talking about here today goes beyond redistricing. it could have implication on voter laws, how you qualify to vote, and it would allow legislatures the winners to make those rules. those are the arguments we re hearing today. those arguments just got underway. it specifically gives the power to legislatures and not to courts. this starts as a fringe theory during the 2000 election, with us it s gained prominence among conservative legal leaders. as julia was mentioning, the