A man convicted of gun possession while illegally using or addicted to a controlled substance is urging the Supreme Court to review and vacate his conviction.
of the white house? like that can t be. you have so many good points. when you look at what s on that no card i was expressing moral outrage, not a policy change. jon cooper put it succinctly. he said this, simultaneously hilarious and terrifying the joe biden think they can make a distinction between official u.s. policy in his personal feelings. tom cotton made a point too. biden needs to stop speaking publicly in an extemporaneous fashion. your feelings are not your feelings you can just pontificate on when you are the out commander in chief yes. i m going to see and raise that took a more. there is one thing to say their strategic ambiguity in the value on that, but then there is a void for vagueness and then there s this third row get out what we ve gotten. at what point does has verbal incompetence started to become a mortal threat to americans? it s already happened. one thing to make gaffes that
joining me now, the former prosecutor who has reported the facts in this case. harry, how does one apply this federal law to potential unauthorized contacts? so the application is straightforward under the elements of the act. flynn acted without authority. he was trying to influence foreign officials. but you ve given the punch line at the beginning. it has never, ever been used successfully and the trick for mueller is whether he wants to take a risk, especially as a free stack charge. i don t think he will. there s a real risk here. even if the facts and evidence, even if there is void for vagueness. does it cover dennis rodman s
unclear that unlike a lot of administrations this trump administration is going to face serious challenges to almost every month it makes so better play the long-term legal game. kirsten, it s pretty stunning if that s the case that just like with the seven country ban there are the judge raised five different constitutional objections to this which seems like a lot on an executive order, you have separation of powers, the violation of spending clause, and one is void for vagueness, which means that there was no explanation for states of how they could not run afoul of this and another violation is that there was no motion to be heard and basically appeal. that s a lot of constitutional violations in one executive order. the white house has said when they put this out that a definition of what is a sanctuary city would be
challenges to almost every major move it makes. it s pretty stunning. if that s the case that just like with the seven country ban i think the legal experts can speak to this a little bit more. but the judge raised five different kooungsitutional objections. you have the separation of powers, violating the senate clause and two fifth amendment violations. void for vagueness, saying there was no explanation of how they could not run afoul of this and another fifth amendment violation was there was no notees to be heard. that s a lot of kaurngsitutional violations in one executive order. also the white house has said that a definition would be forthcoming. then three months, i just talked to the mayor of los angeles, he doesn t know their definition and they ve gotten no