press these articles. he said that the press were hostile or have been hostite press were hostile or have been hostile to press were hostile or have been hostile to him since birth. there is a lot hostile to him since birth. there is a lot of hostile to him since birth. there is a lot of detail coming out of court thick a lot of detail coming out of court thick and a lot of detail coming out of court thick and fast. he is now getting on to how thick and fast. he is now getting on to how he thick and fast. he is now getting on to how he suspected that his phone was being to how he suspected that his phone was being hacked. i quote from the statement, was being hacked. i quote from the statement, this is really at the centre statement, this is really at the centre of statement, this is really at the centre of this case, the allegation by prince centre of this case, the allegation by prince harry of unlawful means being by prince harry of unlawful means being used
in a contact list belonging to a known hacker, which is further proof i was a victim of voice mail interception and unlawful information gathering. he talks about suspicious call data, payments to private investigator and refers to private investigator and refers to chelsy davy, his then girlfriend, and says had she not been in a relationship with him she would never have had to endure such a horrific experience at the hands of mirror group newspaperjournalists. mirror group newspaper journalists. he says mirror group newspaperjournalists. he says this makes me feel physically sick. he was even more shocked, disgusted and appalled when he was shown three handwritten letters to his late mother from a personality, television personality. he discusses the details of this. he suggests this
soon after his parents divorce. mgn says harry is wrong the panorama interview had revealed family emotions and diana s office openly briefed the press about her movements. rugger off harry is a story about a sports injury in the sunday mirror in 2001. this, says mgn, came from a confidential eton source not voice mail interception. and hooray harry s dumped is also from the sunday mirror in 2007. we know prince harry blames mgn for the break up of his relationship with chelsy davy. it says this story was actually based on a news of the world exclusive, not phone hacking. mirror group says it was over a year after voice mail interception had stopped, or been largely cut back at the papers. prince harry will give evidence in person at this court injune. he s one of four claimants alleging that phone hacking and other illicit information gathering was widespread at the papers between 1991 and 2011. mgn contests that. the claimants also say that senior
warra nts compensation . but it denies allegations of voice mail interception in the cases being examined during the trial. lawyers for the duke of sussex, and three other people, argue that executives knew about widespread phone hacking, but did nothing to stop it. 0ur correspondent ellie price was outside the high court a little earlier to explain what happens next. there has been court documents released today where we have been getting more information into exactly what the claimants say has happened, what the unlawful information gathering might look like. this afternoon, as you say, we have been hearing about the duke of sussex and how he feels he was targeted around the time of the death of his mother in 1997 and through his career and write up to decades later.
corruption cases. on one, he was formally charged and pled not guilty. the full trial will now begin. on the second, he was told he would be remanded for eight days in police custody for investigation. against this febrile backdrop, pakistan is waiting to hold national elections while its economy teeters on the brink. the question of who will run pakistan is one neither side is willing to back down from. caroline davis, bbc news, islamabad. in the uk, the mirror group has apologised. they admitted there was some evidence of unlawful behaviour that warrants compensation but it denies allegations of voice mail interception in the case is being examined during the trial. lawyers for the duke of sussex and three other people argue that executives knew about widespread phone hacking but did nothing to stop it. we have