you must understand at incidents. that ground has not been this stage there are there established. and, in coming to my conclusion i have regard to are many issues in dispute. the supreme court of appeal more or less there are four elements of the crime the decision of state versus state must prove. rudolph, 2010, 1 sa-262. obviously there was an action which is admitted by the defense. that there was unlawfulness weighing that particular and that one is obviously matter the accused s past not admitted at this stage. what we call mens rea, which behavior included among has to do with the guilt of others the fact that he had the accused which is also in dispute. all the other issues are an against him relating to domestic violence and already admitted by the that he was out on bail on defense. so ultimately we will have charges of rape and to look at the parameters attempted murder. set by a defense like now that is the type of self-defense, and obviously predisposition to violence
indicated that and i quote, defense which he raised. an applicant in a bail bill: doctor, thank you, application is given a broad really appreciate your inside there from pretoria, scope to establish the south africa. what an hour it s been. requisite circumstances we expected the ruling at whether they relate to the 8:00 a.m. eastern time. nature of the crime, but which is two hours ago. circumstances of applicant we got it 35 minutes ago. to the accused or anything that whole country, they are else that is particularly locked into this case cogent. because there are very few that he was seized with a people more famous than he matter which required the is. martha: what he just said, he will have to testify on his own behalf. accused to show exceptional it will be his word against circumstances exist to this magistrate s word which will be very interesting. justify his release. judge lacocd referred to the matter and others to which i a south african chief magistrate has ruled that ha