lawyer, and remain the right to silence. and the strategic reason is to scare someone, and shake them loose, and i could be indicted and that looks like that is what happened and worked with trump employee four who we now know with mr. taveras, and the way to tell that is that if you are looking at the certain allegations that clearly rely on his testimony, and the conversation, that employee four, de oliveira is seeming to come solely from the testimony of employee number four, and so he was shaken loose by the target letter, and he is cooperating now. and the fact that he is not charged, does that appear how strongly he was cooperating. when you have someone who is cooperating, you have to make a decision, was it engaging so that it was not targeting, and
president is the i.t. worker known as employee number four whose name we have learned is usyuscil taveras. and these charges are stemming from what taveras has told investigators and the fbi. we know that he has not been charged with anything, but that the person that de oliveira has met in the audio closet to discuss the security footage, sara. is this going to be an arrangement or just an appearance in court? as of now, we know that he is going to be appearing in court. whether or not the arraignment happens is still in question. he would need a florida-barred attorney, or florida-based attorney to enter a plea, a right now, there is not a florida attorney on the docket, and we know that he is going to be here with the washington,